Posted on 04/04/2011 2:01:03 PM PDT by RobinMasters
WHAT WILL HE SAY NOW?
Last week in an on-air debate with Donald Trump, Bill OReilly based his entire case for Obamas supposed Hawaii birth on newspaper birth announcements.
With new information emerging now, OReilly may be interested to learn that the announcement images that were posted online cannot be from the microfilms we were told they were from. This article documents that the stories we were told were a well-orchestrated lie, which raises serious questions about the microfilms OReilly says he has found, since those lies back in 2008 would not have been necessary if the microfilms OReilly relies on today had actually been in the libraries in 2008.
Who orchestrated those lies in July of 2008, and why? OReilly might want to send his investigators out to find the answers to those questions, since it is his credibility not Trumps which is on the line now.
Sorry to make you click an extra time, but the only way I know to post the images effectively is in a PDF :
Attention Bill OReilly The Rest of the Story
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
We do not even know where he got the money to go to expensive Colleges. Some say he was a foreign exchange student.
Indeed. And I still say the newspaper wouldn’t have cared if the info came from the DOH or a local citizen, it’s not like anyone was going to lie about a birth announcement, and if they had some reason to, that what was printed in some crummy newspaper meant anything....
Until now, when Bill O’Simpleton says it does.
I don’t know who’s blog this is (http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/) but I think the .pdfs are minimally useful compared to other articles there. To me, this blog makes it clear that the newspaper announcements are complete forgeries.
Interesting post, thanks for posting it.
ping
I've got one more - WHY the hell isn't he in prison? People have gone to prison for less, and he gets off scott free, and becomes President to boot. Unreal!
bm
Butterdezillion hit a grand slam. Nice timing for work that’s been many months in the making. Hopefully someone will take it seriously.
A friend pointed out to me the other day that by his admission of drug use, Obama cannot own a gun in this country. And yet, he is fit to be president? What a screwed up mess.
“the announcements did appear, it means nothing “
Abdo-lutely! I was born in Alexandria, Virginia in ‘46, when my Father worked for the NACA. My maternal Grandparents put a birth announcement in the Akron Beacon Journal, and my paternal Grandparents put an announcement in both the Cleveland Press, and the Plain Dealer. I don’t even know if my arrival was heralded in the Alexandria papers. But it should have been !
Mark for later
Every person who can do something about this has been threatened with, “The cities will burn and the blood will be on your hands!”. Of course, we can’t have that.
This ‘story’ is an April Fool’s Joke.
It is pure fiction.
It is amazing that not one person will come forward about any of this. Tells me there are some scared folks out there.
Exactly - when I go to renew my passport I think I’ll just take a photocopy of the newspaper announcement of my birth instead of my birth certificate. If it’s good enough for O’Reilly it should be good enough for the passport office
...but his mother was on food stamps remember?
Can someone help me here? I looked at the PDF images and they both look similar except for one is a little bit faded than the other. What is butterdezillion trying to prove here? (BTW, I really respect all her work on the BC issue)
Google has probably just turned over to the Democrats the search records of any press or media person who dares ask Questions about Obama’s past.
Do you have a site to cite that says this is an April Fools joke? Or is that just your opinion?
That is my blog. The first expose about the “first discoveries” of the obama newspapaper birth announcements was in :
http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2010/05/28/extra-extra-announcing-obamas-birth
I wrote it like a journal about a year ago, and at the time didn’t know how to do the shots of the pdfs and post them. LOL, I have learned how since. I suppose I should spruce that post up soon.
I collected copies from both newspaper microfilms, from three locations, spanning two months. I shared a full set of second generation copies with Butter.
The copies in my collection allowed for the first real full comparison, which is how the fraud was first proved in that post. Butter has a different angle on it than I did. I only did a brief “history” on the copies Lori Starfelt and Koa released, Butter goes into that in much more detail.
By the way, I have just “heard” that Lori Starfelt passed away in the middle of last month. Isn’t that right about when Trump started to question obama’s birth documents?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.