Posted on 03/26/2011 3:25:25 AM PDT by Sarah-bot
I was thinking about the Libya thing. I thought about Palin's position, then I thought about the position Patton would take. I give you Patton: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kh9S1Hk975U
You said a mouthful.
I don’t want to go to war with China over current events. What I was saying is that I would have wanted to go to war with China over Korea. The reason is because China was providing troops to North Korea.
It could be a blessing or a curse.
Alnick wrote, "The things Gershwin said ain't necessarily so."
:_)
In this I can only assume you mean Obama's ascendancy to the throne.
It's all gone downhill from there.
I’m sure you got the point.
But “for those in Rio Linda,” the idea is that we have 40% of the voters and we worry about niceities.
The liberals have 20% and they worry about getting results anyway they can-—beg, steal, or borrow.
We held Japan until 1952, we held Germany until 1955.
So the question stands. How are were you planing on holding the Russias? Where were you planing on getting the bodies to hold Germany, Japan and the Russias all at the same time?
If we had taken Russia, we would have been the only ones with nuclear technology. If it had not been for the Rosenbergs China would not have nuclear technology.
If we would have went to war with Russia we would not be in the position we are today; a war would not have been left to fight.
AND their domination of the media, AND education, and government employees, AND so-called “mainline” religion, AND the arts, AND Hollywood, AND music...I’m sure there is a lot more.
And they do it with a miserable little minority of misfits.
The same way we did with Japan. The Japanese people are good at heart and so are the Russians.
OHHHH!!!!
I guess I got confused when you said “winning strategies”.
That, inclusively, in my estimation, is the decimation by defamation of a certain proclamation.
And from that no one will “win”. We will merely survive.
Are you all about the onomatopoeia?
No, it is not a urinary infection.
With one occupying soldier for every 200 native pop? And that was with a more or less cooperative guy at the top.
The USSR had about 170 million people at the time.
Oh and we had to prop up Japan to the tune of a million dollars a day just to keep them from starving for the first year.
Where was the money and food for that and the food and money to wage this war with Russia going to come from?
Charlie feels otherwise!
WINNING!
You are calculating the Russian numbers at the levels they would have been prior to the U.S. drive into Russian. After Patton’s drive there would have been 100 million (we had nukes).
All that aside, the Russian people would have embraced us like the Japanese. Like I said the Russian people and the Japanese people are good at heart. It was the leadership that sucked.
If it quacks like a duck...
Nah. This is simple rhyme.
Usually I am more attuned to Paranomasia.
But there is no use in confusing you even more.
Yeah, they are are into that feeling thing.
Let them yell. Let them scream.
Haven’t you ever heard the phrase “silent but deadly”?? ;-))
LOL! Sneeches. LOL!
So you think you are persecuted; what else is new from the liberals.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.