As I posted on another thread, I think most of you are missing the main point here.
It’s NOT the War on Libya we should be focusing on, whether you are for or against.
It’s the now CLEARLY EXPOSED hypocrisy of the Democrats and the anti-war left, who for years literally committed treason, and gave aid to the people killing American Soldiers, so they could try to make George Bush look bad, and get a Democrat elected.
Obama uses words that could have come straight out of George Bush’s mouth when he announced the attacks in his speech, yet the YEAR we spent debating going to war in Iraq was a “Rush To WAR!”.Can someone remind me of the Congressional Debate on War with Libya that I messed?
Where are these people and their faked anti-war outrage now?
Where are the cries of:
“NO BLOOD FOR OIL!”
and
“How many deaths per gallon is oil for France worth??”
or the street demonstration signs printed with:
“Has Obama Killed Enough Kids For TOTAL/Halliburton, Yet?”
with the libs/Democrats carrying them screaming
“OBAMA LIED, LIBYAN KIDS DIED!!”?
In just one day, Obama has turned the entire anti-war left in to open hypocrites. They could always claim the moral high ground, and hide political hate behind the claims of being for peace, not war.
Where are these people now?
I don’t like Mikey “Jabba-The-Pizza-Hutt” Moore, but at least he isn’t being a hypocrite about this.
THIS is where and how we should be attacking Obama and the left on this.
I’m wondering why the US decided to support this action, when it was essentially instigated by the French & British? France, when it didn’t suit them argued against Saddam’s overthrow & didn’t participate. Even Sarkozy opposed the Iraq intervention. So, what’s in it now for those (France, Britain, Lebanon & U.S.) who co-sponsored this at the UN Security Council?