Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N.M. Hispanics Overtake Anglos (non-Hispanic whites 41%)
The Albuquerque Journal ^ | March 16, 2011 | Dan McKay

Posted on 03/16/2011 8:37:16 AM PDT by CedarDave

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: CedarDave

Surprising, the governor of NM, is a CONSERVATIVE female Hispanic. I thought they didn’t exist (according to the left).


21 posted on 03/16/2011 9:30:20 AM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia
It has always seemed to me like there are really three very distinct groups in New Mexico, aside from the native Americans: the Anglos, the Hispanics whose families have been there since the 17th or 18th centuries and then all the newcomer Mexicans, legal and illegal who recently have flooded in and swamped the place. There is a huge difference in attitude between the last two groups.

Very well put and very true. You can include Southern CO in that description also.

22 posted on 03/16/2011 9:33:11 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 ("Take a look around this country. Outside the Beltway, we are all Jews now." Stuart Schwartz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

>>the Hispanics whose families have been there since the 17th or 18th centuries and then all the newcomer Mexicans, legal and illegal who recently have flooded in and swamped the place. There is a huge difference in attitude between the last two groups.

Definitely agree with that. Part of my family came to NM escaping the 1910 revolution and are more on the ‘support the illegals’ side.


23 posted on 03/16/2011 9:35:54 AM PDT by Betis70 (First the House, then the Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Thank you congress


24 posted on 03/16/2011 9:47:23 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Look on the bright side, when is the last time you heard of a Latino Muslim?


25 posted on 03/16/2011 10:22:25 AM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

I do wish they’d make a distinction between those of us whose families have been in New Mexico for hundreds of years like my own family and those who emigrated here from Mexico in the recent past. I’d be curious to have that info.


26 posted on 03/16/2011 10:37:08 AM PDT by LatinaGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LatinaGOP

I would imagine New Mexico was inhabited by a majority of Hispanics when it became a State. My husbands family was among them - inhabitants of the New Mexico region since the 1600’s.


27 posted on 03/16/2011 10:41:13 AM PDT by colorcountry (Comforting lies are not your friends. Painful truths are not your enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry

My sister did our geneology and traced our earliest ancestor to a man who came into what is now New Mexico with Onate in the late 1500’s.


28 posted on 03/16/2011 10:47:09 AM PDT by LatinaGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

I think the ratio where I’m at is 85/15, Hispanics to Anglos. I could care less about the ethnic/racial ratios, but the leftnut to conservative ratio worries me. Figure that 75 to 85 percent of the Hispanic vote will go for leftnuts, although I think Governor Martinez got around 49 percent. How that would translate out to national elections is anyone’s guess.


29 posted on 03/16/2011 10:55:26 AM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LatinaGOP

Interesting. Finding genealogy records has proven tough for that side of my family. We have when my grandpa crossed Eagle Pass, and we know my great-grandpa was from the Torreon Coahuila area, but other than that...not much.

Guess you might get a chilly reception at Acoma, huh? When we went on a tour there, my mom got lots of nasty-gram looks from the tour guide. She finally asked my mom if she was ‘Spanish’ at the end of the tour.


30 posted on 03/16/2011 11:05:28 AM PDT by Betis70 (First the House, then the Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Betis70

My sister found a distant relation on a geneology board who had done all of the research so she lucked out. My paternal grandma was part Mescalero Apache from the Silver City area so I’ve got that in me too. I’m both the oppressor and the oppressed - it’s very confusing. LOL


31 posted on 03/16/2011 11:18:10 AM PDT by LatinaGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
Not really news for those of us who live here. NM has long been an Anglo-minority state ......

The entire United States of America has been "Anglo-minority" since waaaaaaay before 1887 when the pages below were published in "The Irish Race in America". (Click to enlarge.)

Back in the 1800's, an "Anglo" meant somebody with an "Anglo-Saxon" bloodline (the Normans shall not be mentioned) that traced his ancestry back to Merry Olde England. Not even the Scotch-Irish qualified for membership in the Anglo-Saxon Club.

Back then, "Anglo-Saxon" certainly did not mean somebody with parents named Fred Kowalski, Joseph Kennedy, Vincent Lombardi, Robert Stephanopoulos, Abraham Goldberg, David Eisenhower, Elliot Roosevelt, Ralph Olsen, Robert Prudhomme, John Sousa or Jorge Farragut.

It is safe to say that neither New Mexico nor any other state west of the Mississippi River was ever "Anglo-majority".

America is not an Anglo-Saxon bloodline. It is an idea. The potential problems with America's future will not be the passing of the "Anglo" bloodline into minority status (that occured looooong ago) but the carrying on of traditional American ideals by the increased number of "non-Anglos".

If American ideals are carried on by the "non-Anglos", the number of pseudo-Anglos will magically increase just as it did when America discovered, in the early 20th Century, that no amount of denial could hide the fact that the United States was no longer an "Anglo-majority" country:

"Your father, your grandfather, your great-grandfather and your great-great-grandfather were all O'Reillys. But, since you speak English and since we are running short of, ..... well, ..... you know, ..... real Anglo-Saxons, ..... we decided to drastically lower our standards. (Jeez, and we thought we had hit rock-bottom when we decide to include the Germans. Now we are down to the Irish. What next? The Italians?) So, Mr. O'Reilly, you are now officially an 'Anglo'. Welcome to the Anglo-Saxon Club! But we will call you just 'Anglo' so as not to confuse you with ..... well, ..... you know, ..... real Anglo-Saxons."


32 posted on 03/16/2011 11:20:00 AM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Went to UNM 1970-76. Moved to Albuquerque from L.A. A real culture shock. Grew to deeply love New Mexico. Really miss my Hatch chiles here in Virginia.


33 posted on 03/16/2011 11:58:19 AM PDT by oldsicilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LatinaGOP; Betis70
My sister did our geneology and traced our earliest ancestor to a man who came into what is now New Mexico with Onate in the late 1500’s. .... LatinaGOP

Interesting. Finding genealogy records has proven tough for that side of my family. .....When we went on a tour there, my mom got lots of nasty-gram looks from the tour guide. She finally asked my mom if she was ‘Spanish’ at the end of the tour. ..... Betis70

For Spanish genealogy research, you should try searching at PARES (Portada de Archivos Españoles - Web Portal of the Spanish Archives) run by the Spanish Government.

PARES

At "Búsqueda Avanzada" (Advanced Search) type in a last name in "Buscar" (Search) and you will get hits to the documents catalogued in archives all over Spain including the Spanish colonial archives (Archivo General de Indias).

Remember that search engines are very concrete thinkers and not very smart. You will get lots of hits for "Montalban" but will probably get zero hits for "Manuel Ignacio Francisco de Montalban y Ulloa". Keep the search simple.

A couple of years ago, if you discovered a document of interest to you, you had to order photocopies to be made. (You still can.)

Now, however, many of the documents have been digitized and you can view high quality digital images of them, online. Just click on the camera icon if the document has one.

I have discovered a lot of genealogical data in many of the documents, some dating back to the 1500's.

The good news:

1. There are digital images of over 2 million pages of documents. More digitized documents are being added every day.

The bad news:

1. They are in Spanish. (No problem for me.)
2. They are in OLD Spanish. (Okay, now we start having some problems. Thank goodness for online dictionaries.)
3. They are in handwriting.
4. They are in OLD handwriting.
5. They are sometimes in OLD, BAD handwriting.
6. The style of old handwriting changed from century to century. Once you learn the script from the 1700's, you can be lost in the 1600's. Once you learn the script from the 1600's you can be lost in the 1500's.
7. Even if you learn the script and the old language, the documents are full of abbreviations.

The good news, again:

There is help online.

The Mormons have a web page that gives you a tutorial on old Spanish script and abbreviations:

Spanish Script Tutorial created by the Center for Family History and Genealogy at Brigham Young University.

If you go to Google Books and search for "Paleografia española" you can dowload free digital copies of books witten in the 1800's and even the 1700's that taught Spaniards in the 1800's and 1700's how to read the paleography from the 1600's and before.

(Click to enlarge and go to this particular Google Book: "Anales de la Paleografía Española", 1857.)


34 posted on 03/16/2011 12:45:55 PM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Polybius

Wow! Thanks for the information. My dad did a bunch of research before he passed away via Ancestry.com, but we always ran into a bit of a brick wall with my mom’s family. Maybe this will help.

FReepers rock.


35 posted on 03/16/2011 1:39:23 PM PDT by Betis70 (First the House, then the Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry

We have traced my family origin in New Mexico to Diego Castillo. He came to New Mexico in 1598 with Onate. He was a native of Torrijos Spain. I proudly carry the Castillo last name today.

There needs to be a distinction made between the “old families” and the new invaders. We are two very different groups. We love this country, while on the other hand they exploit it, and our cultures are distincly different. Theirs is Mexican, while ours is Spanish Colonial.


36 posted on 03/16/2011 3:01:41 PM PDT by sean327 (God created all men equal, then some become Marines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson