Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

See article for links to original two-part series.
1 posted on 03/08/2011 5:28:02 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: maggief

http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory?id=13076858

Celebrities, Pols Benefit From Colo. Ag Tax Breaks
Goldie Hawn, Tom Cruise among celebrities benefiting from Colo. lower agricultural tax rate

DENVER March 7, 2011 (AP)


2 posted on 03/08/2011 5:29:03 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief
End subsidies now! All ag subsidies do is drive up ag land prices by subsidizing investors, hunting clubs, retirees, etc. that never had any intention of farming the land.

If I want to retire a nice 80 acres of what was farming land, but not farm it, the gubmit will pay me a money to do it. Sure, its not enough for an actual farming family to live on, but it sure does offset my expenses.

4 posted on 03/08/2011 5:32:00 AM PST by SampleMan (If all of the people currently oppressed shared a common geography, bullets would already be flying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

I raise cattle and enjoy a greatly reduced tax rate. If you want to see the price of beef go sky high and the US become dependent on foreign sources for food, just go messing with the ag exemption.


5 posted on 03/08/2011 5:32:57 AM PST by RushingWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

I doubt Tom Cruise or Goldie Hawn are raisning any crops themselves, perhaps they rent that property to others who work it for them. If they are raising crops on the property and are entitled to the tax break , why shouldn’t they get it?

When investers buy property for future development they should not be entitled to tax breaks.


7 posted on 03/08/2011 5:39:43 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

Our founding fathers would be most distressed by the dictatorship in office and the amount of taxes we spend.


10 posted on 03/08/2011 5:47:43 AM PST by mountainlion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief
Good for them.

It's every American's patriotic duty to pay as little tax as possible. And I support it even when liberals do it unless they're being hypocritical about it, and I don't recall them saying people need to be taxed more.

And, BTW, a tax rate reduction is not the same as a "subsidy". I'm all for all the tax breaks we can get.

11 posted on 03/08/2011 5:48:46 AM PST by Jotmo (Has 0bama fixed my soul yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

If wealthy celebrities utilize their land such that they meet the requirements of the law, then good for them. They are entitled to the tax break.


13 posted on 03/08/2011 5:56:30 AM PST by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

How much of a tax break and direct payments did that silk stocking lawyer and Senator Salazar get for his “family farm?”
He’s recently found religion in the sage grouse totem that prevents oil development in the western lands.


23 posted on 03/08/2011 6:17:35 AM PST by calico_thompson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief
Idiocy to consider lower taxes on unimproved land a subsidy of any sort. It has always been thus.
24 posted on 03/08/2011 6:18:17 AM PST by Dust in the Wind (U S Troops Rock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

you’d pay 5 to 8 times that on a three bedroom house in my area


31 posted on 03/08/2011 7:16:03 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson