Posted on 02/25/2011 11:11:08 AM PST by lbryce
Sue for false arrest and imprisonment!
A cop can record me (we see these all the time on tv) as evidence I may be committing a crime?
The city government can record me (traffic cam) as evidence I may be committing a crime?
The store can record me (shoplifting) as evidence I may be committing a crime? ...
Ever body can record me ..all without my permission...as evidence I may be committing a crime?
But I can not record any evidence to defend myself against the charge I may have committed the crime?
The cops don’t want you recording them because its shedding light upon their criminal actions causing them and their unions great grief...
One that obviously passes your understanding...
They don’t have ‘balls’. They have a lack of integrity, respect for their profession and an aggregiously blatant disrepect for those they protect. Most have self-image and control issues and something about how their mommy and daddy treated them when they were in shorts.
Sounds like Deprivation of Civil Rights under Color of Law and Official Oppression.
Don’t forget phone calls being recorded “for quality control purposes”; once, when esp. bored on some insane phone call to golly knows where, the person asked if it was OK if they recorded the conversation. I replied “Certainly. I record all my phone calls as well.”
Full stop. “You mean... You’re recording this right now?” “Oh, absolutely - you don’t mind do you?” After tweaking with them, THEY claimed that ME recording was “against company policy” and they hung up right away.
Gee you'd think a learned person would recognize Weare, NH as the home of a US Supreme Court Justice Souter. Deeply enmeshed in the eminent domain ruling, such that the people up here tried to seize his home using the same arguments. Look it up.
Oh, yeah, that “rag” is the Manchester Union Leader. World Famous, just not in your little world. Once called Reagan a liberal!! That far right. Also, torpedoed Ed Muskey campaign, long ago. ( I go back that far)
Nashua, the “Gate city” (on the border with MA, not the “gay city”, get you ears cleaned out!) The problem with Nashua is illegals overflowing from MA. I can remember when signs were in English and French (french Canadians), think there are some churches that still hold services in french.
OK, Nashua= Gate city, Manchester is the “Queen City”, look it up. The “gaiety you seek is on the coast, all 18 miles of it. Try Portsmouth.
The “rag” from Nashua is the “Nashua Telegraph”, total liberal paper. Wouldn't line a birdcage with it, that would be redundant!
Before you besmirch Nashua any further, “Money” magazine called it the best city in the US to live TWICE in ten years. Had to stop identifying cities and switched to “regions after that.
Weare is “small town”, think Mayberry. NH has had some difficulty with the “wiretap” issue. Since I'm in the same county, maybe I can be on the jury and let FR what happens!
Have fun. Rohn
If there is tape of the interaction, Officer X can no longer rely on the court to take his word over that of the accused simply because he’s one of The Brotherhood..
Once an officer is faced with his own words or image on a tape, that officer can no longer lie with impunity.
It’s as simple as that.
Believe!
Yep.
The trunk is the national guard armory, and the back seat is the county jail, the cop’s coat pocket is the evidence room, and the citation booklet is your bill of rights. yep yep
Quit giving them ideas steely
Seriously though, when you talk to someone with cellphones, the communication signal doesnt go directly from one cell to the next. It goes through various cell towers and some hard lines are used also. This is why they consider cell phones to be wires.
“I consider modern cops to be either idiots or brownshirts. Or they just couldn’t find any other job.”
Your description is pretty much close to mine. I’ve believed that most cops were either bullied in junior high and high school or were the bullies themselves.
For the former, it’s a psychological attempt to get the power and respect they didn’t get in years past. For the latter, it’s a continued opportunity to continue acting as they did in high school.
How do we know that these people are not staging these incidnets, getting a fat settlement, then paying each other off?
Think about it. You never hear the name of the civilian who files the complaint and gets paid off ever again, and the cop who does this 99% of the time keeps his job.
Who gets screwed...the taxpayer..what else is new?
How do we know that these people are not staging these incidents, getting a fat settlement, then paying each other off?
Think about it. You never hear the name of the civilian who files the complaint and gets paid off ever again, and the cop who does this 99% of the time keeps his job.
Who gets screwed...the taxpayer..what else is new?
When you hear hoofbeats, think "horses," not "zebras." In other words, "give me a flippin' break, man."
The last time I heard of anyone getting a settlement from police abuse of authority was in an open-carry harassment case in Virginia, and it was only $20,000, which probably didn't even cover the legal expenses.
And if you don't want taxpayers to get screwed, insure that your local police don't screw the taxpayers.
Your insult explains your arrogance and nothing else. Highlighting a sentence in an article could mean a number of things.
The only thing obvious is that you refuse to clarify your position.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.