“My personal opinion is...”
Sure fair enough but what I disagree with is a particular homosexual faction. There should not be this distinction. There should be only one identifier- Conservative. Not black conservative, white conservative, lesbian conservative blah blah blah. Just conservative. End of story.
I would imagine it would be easier to criticize homosexual behavior if you aren’t looking for votes from the people you’re criticizing. You don’t want them in the big tent. You don’t want them working at RNC or for Republicans in DC.
I think we should try to see if we can get the rapists support. What do the rapists want? And the arsonist-americans? More bonfires at events? Any crazy people, any interest group at all, we are supposed to allow them to influence our message?
The deal breaker for me is the growing association with Muslim Brotherhood types. As for the embezzlement, there have been a lot of examples of people on top with their hand in the cookie jar. Then prosecute those individuals for embezzlement. The MB associations however indicate the organization has been seriously compromised. MB and small government conservatism is incompatible to the point of mutually exclusive.
My point exactly.
I have to wonder if they’re queers who happen to be conservative or if they’re leftist queers trying to come on strong to make the conservative movement appear “intolerant.”