Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Santorum's pander: Balsa Rick
Pittsburgh Tribune ^ | 1/30/2011

Posted on 01/30/2011 12:27:39 PM PST by Born Conservative

Rick Santorum's nascent presidential campaign has died with a whimper fueled by a pander. And no matter whether it was born out of ignorance, political expediency or both, there's no excuse.

Mr. Santorum, the former U.S. senator and representative of Pennsylvania, spoke to the Iowa Renewable Fuels Association Tuesday last in Des Moines. All U.S. vehicles should be required to burn ethanol and other biofuels in addition to gasoline, he said.

"This is purely and simply a national security issue," said Santorum, a one-time opponent of taxpayer subsidies for alternative fuels, noting that some oil-producing countries are hostile to the United States. (See today's George Will column to better slay the implications of this rationale.)

Santorum said it's the government's responsibility to expand the marketplace for such alternative fuels by mandating their use. (And just as incredible, Newt Gingrich said much the same thing last week.)

(Excerpt) Read more at pittsburghlive.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alternativefuels; biofuel; santorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 01/30/2011 12:27:44 PM PST by Born Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
Lucky for Santorum my instincts tell me not to trust The Corrupt Professional Left Bass Turds to give me the whole story.

If, by some miracle, this does turn out to be true, then all I can say is, "WHAT!?"

2 posted on 01/30/2011 12:29:56 PM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
Ok, Rickie boy, when do we switch to all diesel motors.
3 posted on 01/30/2011 12:30:29 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

It doesn’t matter. The only way Santorum could be a viable presidential candidate this go around (or any in the future unless he gets back into the Senate or is elected Governor of Pennyslvania) would be — God forbid it — if there were a mass casualty terrorist attack on U.S. soil, in which case films of his warnings while a Senator and just after losing his seat would give him a prophetic and Churchillian ring.


4 posted on 01/30/2011 12:41:52 PM PST by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

As my former Senator and a farmer in PA, I’ll be the first to tell Rick to STFU. He was a good Senator, but he’s off the wall on this one. Ethanol is killing not only the small engines that “have” to use it, it’s also taking away one product that we all need - and that is food. What a jackwagon he is.


5 posted on 01/30/2011 12:43:45 PM PST by hkp123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

By backing ethanol Ricky has committed Political Suicide!


6 posted on 01/30/2011 12:45:01 PM PST by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
Santorum lost me when he supported Arlen Specter instead of Pat Toomey.
7 posted on 01/30/2011 12:49:47 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

He was a good, steady Senator, and I was very sorry to see some conservatives turn against him in 2006, but he really has gone off the rails in the past few months. I guess he’s just desperate to get back into politics.

But this ain’t the way to do it. Liberals wouldn’t touch him on a bet, and now he’s kicking conservatives.


8 posted on 01/30/2011 12:50:18 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
The NRA lost me when they did the same thing.

I didn't know he supported Sphincter over Toomey. That worked out well for him, didn't it?

9 posted on 01/30/2011 12:52:58 PM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hkp123

Google “santorum” lol.


10 posted on 01/30/2011 12:54:59 PM PST by RedwM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

Sorry Rick. You don’t believe this ethanol crap, and we don’t either. Stop the pandering!! Bob


11 posted on 01/30/2011 12:57:39 PM PST by alstewartfan ("He sees past the glamour,She sees past the liesThe night is quick to angerthe dawn is slow to rise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Renegade

It requires more energy to produce one gallon of ethanol than the energy contained by that gallon.

The problem is that this whole ethanol utopia was thought out by a bunch of non-technical, non-principled, political morons instead of thermodynamicists.

Drill baby, drill.


12 posted on 01/30/2011 12:59:07 PM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

Me too. Actions have consequences.


13 posted on 01/30/2011 1:10:59 PM PST by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

Generally, it is stupid to burn our food in a time of peace, when there are ample supplies of oil.

But the cars should, since it is easy enough, be able to run on ethanol, so if Iran decides to nuke the middle east, we can switch over to high-ethanol mixes, since we can grow a lot of extra ethanol if we absolutely have to, especially if we stop supplying food to the world because there’s a pending apocalypse.


14 posted on 01/30/2011 1:40:46 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG
It requires more energy to produce one gallon of ethanol than the energy contained by that gallon.

Exactly. Even leftists don't champion ethanol anymore. It certainly wasn't mentioned in the latest SOTU.

Drill baby, drill.

YES... Drill, dig, nuke. Also, windmill, geothermal, hydro, solar panel, conservation. If we want to break the yoke of foreign oil we need an "All of the above" energy policy -- leave NO stone unturned. I pledge $100 in campaign donations to the first politician that aggressively pursue EVERY energy source at America's disposal... and I don't care what letter comes after their name. But they have to REALLY follow through on EVERY energy source.
15 posted on 01/30/2011 1:58:35 PM PST by VictoryGal (Never give up, never surrender! REMEMBER NEDA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

my 2 cents...

Let’s stop burning bourbon.

From a national security point of view, we simply need a strong economy, which yields a strong dollar, which allows us to buy OPO (other people’s oil) cheaply until it’s all gone. Then we drill for our own and sell it at top dollar.

A strong economy is the foundation of national security. When we’re ready to cut scope of government to what makes sense, (Depts of State, Treasury, War and Justice), and have them actually do their respective jobs, then we’re off to the races to a standard of living 10 times higher than today and the rest of the world will again be 100 years behind us. The private sector could get going and oil would cost less than $30 per barrel for us.


16 posted on 01/30/2011 2:09:24 PM PST by PieterCasparzen (Huguenot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alstewartfan
Sorry Rick. You don’t believe this ethanol crap, and we don’t either.

This is enough to take him out of contention. He's now a consummated politician.

17 posted on 01/30/2011 2:20:00 PM PST by Digger ((If RINO is your selection, then failure is your election))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
Santorum lost me when he supported Arlen Specter instead of Pat Toomey.

That's when I lost all respect for Rush Limbaugh. One word from him & Toomey would've won.

Now that you mention it, I really liked Santorum before that! But yeah, I never thought of him as anything but a hack after that. That primary made me sick, but it opened my eyes.

18 posted on 01/30/2011 2:25:30 PM PST by Forgotten Amendments (I'd rather be Plaxico Burress than Sean Taylor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

Toomey seems to be thumbing his nose at Tea Partiers who elected him.

I looked, but couldn’t find an e-Mail for Toomey.


19 posted on 01/30/2011 2:29:48 PM PST by FroggyTheGremlim (My memory's not as sharp as it used to be. Also, my memory's not as sharp as it used to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: VictoryGal

>Even leftists don’t champion ethanol anymore.<

.
It should have never been championed in the first place.

A lie is a lie is a lie whether it are the Bushes, Carter, Obama or any future or past president who say it. Technological questions should be resolved by bona fide scientists and not by political idealogues like Gore and others.

And by the way, don’t fall too much in love with windpower either. Let’s first use our God-given natural wealth waiting for us in the depth of our soil.

Dig, dynamite and drill, baby. Just imagine the huge employment needs that will be created in this country if we just use our brain.


20 posted on 01/30/2011 2:36:01 PM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson