I hope you didn't miss that part ~ whatever the Appeals Court said on the matter is NULL AND VOID, and that ain't no Freeper!
Do I seriously have to type out "Illinois" every time I mention the Supreme Court in a thread about the Illinois Supreme Court? Seriously?
The appeals court argument goes straight to the heart of the (Illinois) Supreme Court decision. Their logic and reasoning about the meaning and intent of the law is no more "null and void" than trigonometry would be if the Supreme Court ruled that Pi was equal to three. The Appeals Court decision may be null and void, but their reasoning is not.
I wonder if the legislature, and particularly the legislator who introduced the bill to exempt active duty military from the "resides in" requirement will quietly accept this slap in the face from the usurper Supreme Court which just legalized carpetbagging by anyone who can claim they "intend" to reside in Illinois.
Corrupt? You still haven't explained why there are two residency requirements, one for a "qualified elector" and a separate one for a candidate. I guess you're too busy being snarky to me to get around to it.