Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Media Research Center Documents Liberal Death Wishes Against Conservatives
CNSNews ^ | January 12, 2011 | Michael W. Chapman

Posted on 01/12/2011 11:58:43 AM PST by jazusamo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
The enemedia love these leftists.
1 posted on 01/12/2011 11:58:53 AM PST by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Obama: “They Bring a Knife…We Bring a Gun”
Obama to His Followers: “Get in Their Faces!”
Obama on ACORN Mobs: “I don’t want to quell anger. I think people are right to be angry! I’m angry!”
Obama to His Mercenary Army: “Hit Back Twice As Hard”
Obama on the private sector: “We talk to these folks… so I know whose ass to kick.“
Obama to voters: Republican victory would mean “hand to hand combat”
Obama to lib supporters: “It’s time to fight for it.”
Obama to Latino supporters: “Punish your enemies.”
Obama to democrats: “I’m itching for a fight.”


2 posted on 01/12/2011 12:04:50 PM PST by astyanax (Liberalism: Logic's retarded cousin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I’ll say this again, and I hope whoever was offended by it this morning reads it again -

the left’s wet dream is to use the power of the state to punish and kill their ideological opponents.

This is an historic fact.


3 posted on 01/12/2011 12:08:59 PM PST by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

There should be enough material there to fill a tankership, after what the Bush adminstration endured for eight long years....


4 posted on 01/12/2011 12:13:11 PM PST by SueRae (I can see November 2012 from my HOUSE!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Nothing to see here...just move along people....

/ state run media

5 posted on 01/12/2011 12:14:29 PM PST by lormand (A Government who robs Peter to pay Paul, will always have the support of Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Please - can’t we go for just one day without these “He said, she said” sorts of accusation? The Left hates the Right and points out their incendiary language. The Right hates the Left and points out *their* incendiary language.

No one on either side feels the slightest guilt about the way they talk, or the metaphors they use. Nobody is going to change the way they describe things.

All these repeated charges and counter-charges - that have been going on for years now - do is strengthen the mutual distrust, antagonism, and even *hatred* on both sides.

Okay, we get it. We understand! The Left is worse than the Right! Of course, the Left argues that the Right is worse than the Left, and produces its OWN list of evidence.

And then both sides ignore the arguments of the other. It’s getting repetitious. And it’s not solving a damned thing.

Assuming that neither they nor we are about to change the discourse anytime soon, what, then, do we do? Seriously?
Do we want to learn to talk to each other, or is it just impossible?

If it’s impossible, what is your proposed solution?


6 posted on 01/12/2011 12:17:39 PM PST by worst-case scenario (Striving to reach the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
...But if that man was Rush Limbaugh, and you were Sarah Spitz, a producer for National Public Radio, that isn’t what you’d do at all.

In a post to the list-serv Journolist, an online meeting place for liberal journalists, Spitz wrote that she would “Laugh loudly like a maniac and watch his eyes bug out” as Limbaugh writhed in torment.

In boasting that she would gleefully watch a man die in front of her eyes, Spitz seemed to shock even herself. “I never knew I had this much hate in me,” she wrote. “But he deserves it.”

Public radio producer fantasized about watching Rush Limbaugh die on Journolist

7 posted on 01/12/2011 12:21:28 PM PST by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: worst-case scenario

It seems MRC took the time to look up the facts and state them on the record.


8 posted on 01/12/2011 12:22:27 PM PST by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MrB
"The left’s wet dream is to use the power of the state to punish and kill their ideological opponents.

This is an historic fact.

Absolutely and horribly corect. The history of the twentieth century is strewn with their killing fields. They are monsters - killers without conscience. So how do the worst get on top? How do these killers, these monsters, acquire what they should never in a million years get their hands on – the apparatus of the state? They’ve got help, and lots of it. They are Antonio Gramsci’s heirs and disciples. The Left’s “useful idiots”. Here’s a brief taxonomy of the killers without conscience and their enablers:

1. Wishful thinkers (and the mentally lazy) – don’t these people just wish that the world was a nicer place? If only everyone were just as smart, just as clever, just as enlightened as they think they are, it surely would be, wouldn’t it? Wishful thinkers and those like them aren’t really up to doing the heavy lifting to achieve their utopia, but they surely do vote and applaud into power those whom they believe will usher in the New Age. The trouble is, those they empower typically have an agenda that doesn’t quite match that of our dreamers. And no one is more surprised than they are when it all goes bad and the body count – their body count - mounts up.

2. Coercive utopians – they have a lot in common with our wishful thinkers, but they know that no one is going to do what it takes to usher in the new millennium, the New Man or that immanent eschaton. But there’s a problem: put the sort of totalitarian regime necessary to achieve those goals - that is, socialism/communism and all of its imperatives and consequences - right out on the table in front of everyone, and no sane individual would buy it. Who would actively and openly cheer for the impoverishment and enslavement of humankind and the mass murder of those who won’t go along with it? The hard Left, that’s who, and they’ve said as much - but that’s beside the point for now.

The hallmark of coercive types is that they tend to be fairly bloody-minded. For example, Billy Ayers (0bama's good buddy andadvisor) and his wrecking crew thought that once they achieved power would have to slaughter over 25 million Americans too stubborn to toe their utopian socialist line – that was back in the 1970’s so we’re actually giving him a bit of a discount on that 25 million figure. But what’s a few million here and there? Eric Hobsbawm, Marxist historian (now there’s an oxymoron) has also said as much in a BBC interview where he allowed as to how the ’sacrifice’ of millions would have been worth it in order to achieve socialism. So – is a little slaughter and a ‘re-education camp’ or two or 10 not too much a price to pay for heaven on Earth? Not for the coercive utopians. Not by half.

3. Lord of the flies – now we’re at the top of the pyramid of power, and those driven by that insatiable will to power. These are the ones who, once they achieve absolute power, really make things happen. And we’ve got over 260 million dead in this century and the last one to prove it. Now, let’s say that again – that’s 260 million unarmed civilian non-combatants killed by their own governments. They were murdered by those exercising the power of the state. They were starved, gassed, tortured, shot, impaled, burned alive, drowned, frozen to death, hacked apart with hoes, axes and machetes – a litany of brutality and atrocity beyond human imagination. Hundreds of millions more lived their lives enslaved, impoverished and in despair. Communism, socialism, the immanent eschaton – who cares? Ideology is only the particular horse they ride in pursuit of absolute control of mankind.

Those who are driven by the will to power typically disguise their intentions under the guise of ‘achieving the greatest good for the greatest number’ or under the rubrics of social or economic justice. They may claim that they are ‘doing the business of the people’ or that they are acting according to ‘the will of the people’. The statement, ‘It’s for the children,’ should inspire instant disbelief and skepticism. When it has come to creating the ‘New Socialist Man,’ or immanentizing that eschaton or ushering in that New Age, those who advance such arguments remain untroubled by the oceans of blood they would have to spill and the mountains of corpses they would have to pile up in order to realize their dreams. They are all animated by the unrestrained and unappeasable ‘will to power’. The Will to Power plays itself out at all levels. From the malice or indifference of the petty bureaucrat to the most savage and demonic mass murderers of recent times. As we have seen, power and the exercise of that power is more addictive than any drug.

The need is insatiable. The result is horror.

So – where are our modern so-called ‘progressives’ in all of this? Here’s my question for a proud ‘progressive’: If you’re a follower or apologist for today’s political and social multiculturalism, an adherent of liberal democracy, or believe that our culture can continue without a basis in moral absolutes, which camp do you suppose you belong in? Are you a cynical but clever elitist intoxicated by the will to power? Are you on to the deception but support it out of pathological spite? Or are you simply ignorant of your role in the intentional destruction of your culture, even if you think you know what's best for the rest of us?

Finally, here’s a purely practical consideration for all you precious 'progressives' out there: you may want to re-think your premises, because you are not likely to survive the consequences of the very bad ideas you’re advocating. History is my witness.

9 posted on 01/12/2011 12:22:43 PM PST by Noumenon ("We should forgive our enemies, but not before they are hanged.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Let’s go a little further, shall we? How many hundreds of millions of innocent people have been murdered by their many types of Socialist governments? You can call them “NAZI”, “Communist”, or “Fascist”, or even the morphed “Progressives”, but they are all the same and control the Democratic Party and almost all of the world’s media and education systems today.

They are obviously making a big push right now. Stand firm and for God’s sake, don’t give in!


10 posted on 01/12/2011 12:23:57 PM PST by Dogbert41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: worst-case scenario
Sorry, but you seem to be implying that both sides are the same, or equally guilty.
Find anything conservatives have done that compares to this:
The progressive “climate of hate:” An illustrated primer, 2000-2010
And no, I don't believe you can talk to people who behave like this. Nor do I have any desire to.
11 posted on 01/12/2011 12:25:04 PM PST by astyanax (Liberalism: Logic's retarded cousin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: astyanax

Okay, you don’t want to talk to Liberals. How, them are you proposing that this country overcome its problems?


12 posted on 01/12/2011 12:28:52 PM PST by worst-case scenario (Striving to reach the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]



13 posted on 01/12/2011 12:29:21 PM PST by devolve (. . . . . . Wagya Butt for only $100 pound . . Some are too dense to leave their own houses . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
The so-called ‘news’ media have zero currency in this debate because we have documented the Left using hateful, vicious language far worse than any conservative.”

"No facts please, we're Democrats."

The 1960s Marxist-Alinsky street/campus revolutionary rabble and their ideological issue, the Democratic Party Establishment, don't do debating.. they rail, they rant, they move on to the next "issue." Turmoil, that's their ticket.

It's called mau-mauing.

Responding as though they want discourse makes you nothing more than flak catchers. RE: Tom Wolfe's book Radical Chic & Mau-Mauing the Flak Catchers

I think conservatives today are doing the right thing, they are addressing the independents and apolitical and telling the mau-mauing Left to pound salt.

We have the Internet and modern talk radio today we cannot let them take away our free speech rights this time (I am referring to how the left used the "Fairness Doctrine" against us a generation ago.)

14 posted on 01/12/2011 12:31:16 PM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Wow!

How did the left-stream "media" miss all this?

I think I just answered my own question...

15 posted on 01/12/2011 12:34:30 PM PST by jeffc (Prayer. It's freedom of speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dogbert41
Read William Shiere, “The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich.”
Nazis were NOT socialists. Their name “National Socialist”, was an attempt to ingratiate themselves with the German public in the 30s, when the Socialists *were* popular in Germany.

When they got into power, they sent Socialists and Communists to the death camps right along with Jews, Slavs, Gypsies, and homosexuals.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_Party

16 posted on 01/12/2011 12:37:39 PM PST by worst-case scenario (Striving to reach the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: worst-case scenario
"Okay, you don’t want to talk to Liberals. How, them are you proposing that this country overcome its problems?"
Let me return the question to you.
Do you believe the country can "overcome its problems" by pointing out to liberals that "No, George Bush ISN'T the antichrist" and "No, monkeys do NOT defecate on McCain's head"?
In other words, what exactly do you think dialogue can accomplish with people whose beliefs and actions are not based on facts or logic?
17 posted on 01/12/2011 12:47:38 PM PST by astyanax (Liberalism: Logic's retarded cousin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: worst-case scenario
When a bully pushes on you, you need to push back or you will eventually be rolled over.

Yes, it gets tiresome. But it is necessary. One side doesn't have the unilateral choice to end the fight peacefully, only the unilateral choice to surrender -- or to fight to win.

18 posted on 01/12/2011 12:48:50 PM PST by slowhandluke (It's hard to be cynical enough in this age.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: worst-case scenario

.

OK - Right!

Now spin this lameØ:

United Soviet Socialist Republics

.


19 posted on 01/12/2011 12:49:53 PM PST by devolve (. . . . . . Wagya Butt for only $100 pound . . Some are too dense to leave their own houses . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: worst-case scenario
Okay, you don’t want to talk to Liberals. How, them are you proposing that this country overcome its problems?

By utterly defeating them.

20 posted on 01/12/2011 12:54:51 PM PST by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson