[r9etb]

Guess what, bucko? That image is a complete manufacture of the MSM - and you are joining in on it. Typical. It's pretty pathetic that you are joining in the line of attack on the Tea Party instead of defending it here.

Again, I'm just telling you the truth, which apparently you recognize but don't want to acknowledge. That's your problem, not mine

As for the Tea Party movement -- no, I don't have much use for it, because it seems to be viscerally opposed to doing those things that would make it politically effective in a positive way, rather than just being a group of folks saying what they're against.

[Sans-Culotte]

As for the Tea Party movement -- no, I don't have much use for it, because it seems to be viscerally opposed to doing those things that would make it politically effective in a positive way, rather than just being a group of folks saying what they're against.

I suggest you do a google search for "2010 election results".

[okie01]

Those on this board who object to 'blood libel' have but one reason for objecting.

They also object to Sarah Palin. Usually for reasons that cannot be convincingly articulated.

Fact is, 'blood libel' is having the same effect as 'death panels'. It is unhinging the left...and stiffening the resolve of most on the right...because it is true.

And, if it is true, how can it possibly be "inappropriate"?