So which person in a consensual relationship is the perp, and which is the victim?
Are you talking about the "pitcher" or "catcher"?
I understand that in some Hispanic societies that only the "catcher" is considered queer.
So which person in a consensual relationship is the perp, and which is the victim?
It’s like baseball, you got one person thats the pitcher and the other person is the catcher, sometimes they change positions.
Neither one, they are both complicit in their actions.
Two guys rob a bank, one goes in and the other stays with the getaway car........Who's the perp and who is the willing accomplice?
Fe fi fo fum, I smell the stench of a moral relativist Lib-er-al-tar-i-an.
In cases of drunk on drunk sex, the first one to complain is usualy the gainer. However, for real, it’s a question of finding intent, premeditation, possession, exploitation etc... The devil goes into the details. It’s difficult to manage, that is why it should be banned in the end altogether.
They key is that just as the police state wants to remove freedom of speech, of assembly and mutual support of Christians and jealous feminist powers want to remove or control communication between father and children (ever wonder why it was Mother and not Common Folks Against Drunk Driving?), when a gay is found to prevent another gay from freeing themselves from burning lust to being true fountains of blessings of life, it’s right there intent of rape and possession found.
It’s going to come to that. Right now gays are profiting from the Police state’s always awkward attempts at controling communication for a free for all destruction. Mark my words, the police state wants its revenues and will ratchet up the very extermination of gays and hypies it is now promoting for worship “in tempore gratificas”.