“Yep, that’s been grating on me too.
When we went through the entrance examinations they asked you straight up if your were a homo. Any affirmative response got your ass booted out the door immediately.
DADT was implemented by the Clinton administration to open the door for fags. The purpose of this so called “repeal” is to open the door all of the way so that psycho perverts can practice their disgusting behavior/sickness openly.”
My question is then, what work place in this country allows you to display your sex life. What place does it have there, in this case, possibly on a battlefield against an entrenched enemy? I am not sure what this argument of serving “openly” implies, and why they so sorely want this “victory”. Does it mean, a cross dresser wear female uniforms? It is so very weird.
There is absolutely not ONE Civil right being denied with DADT!!
Go to ANY place where this is being discussed, the main problem is:
1. Being invited to official functions and not being able to bring your partner.
2. Not being able to have a picture of your partner displayed on your desk or locker.
I am still waiting to hear from anyone who can tell me where it is in the Constitution where it pertains to party invitations and photos?