Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: edge919

“He was not allowed to challenge the lawfulness of his orders...”

Actually, he stated in court that the orders WERE lawful, and that he was wrong to disobey them. That is tough to appeal.


196 posted on 12/16/2010 3:11:03 PM PST by Mr Rogers (Poor history is better than good fiction, and anything with lots of horses is better still)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers
Actually, he stated in court that the orders WERE lawful, and that he was wrong to disobey them. That is tough to appeal.

The court already ruled that his questions of lawfulness were irrelevant prior to the trial ... and we weren't talking about appeals, but civil lawsuits.

198 posted on 12/16/2010 3:16:16 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers

He never said that about his deployment orders, if I’m understanding correctly. He pleaded not guilty to that.


208 posted on 12/16/2010 3:25:21 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson