Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

“No Labels” Group Meets … Or Why I Would Prefer You Not Call Me A Lefty
http://radioviceonline.com/ ^ | December 14,2010 | Jim Vicevich

Posted on 12/14/2010 3:21:25 AM PST by Biggirl

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Biggirl
No More Labels: Because if we listed the ingredients, you'd never swallow our crap
21 posted on 12/14/2010 4:19:14 AM PST by Eroteme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

More mush...


22 posted on 12/14/2010 5:13:37 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Impeachment !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eroteme

“No More Labels: Because if we listed the ingredients, you’d never swallow our crap”

I like that. It would look good on a a t-shirt.


23 posted on 12/14/2010 6:01:55 AM PST by This I Wonder32460
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

I would prefer to call them

No Label Liberal Loony Leftards!


24 posted on 12/14/2010 6:02:27 AM PST by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steven Tyler

you cant’ fit all that on a bumpr stickr


25 posted on 12/14/2010 6:04:45 AM PST by griswold3 (Employment is off-shored, away from govt. regulations, price pressure groups, and liabilities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

“No labels” is itself a label.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
The press already has that policy in effect.

Let you, an R, run for asst dog catcher and ten years later get caught up in something illegal, and the headline will read “FORMER REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE..etc...etc...etc”

Let a sitting, high ranking D commit or be involved in a heinous crime and you will have to read the entire paper to find out that he is a D.

Of course, by ‘their’ excluding the D to begin with, we have just presumed he was a D because of the omission.

So, the plan works???


26 posted on 12/14/2010 6:09:09 AM PST by xrmusn ((6/98))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: This I Wonder32460

Thanks.

The quickest way to shut down their dopey semantics ploy is to make their own new, improved non-label label just as toxic as the original.

What ridiculous little people they are.


27 posted on 12/14/2010 6:14:11 AM PST by Eroteme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

“No Labels” - really? Why now? I can tell you why. The liberals lost, therefore, they want “bipartisanship” to pass their liberal agenda. If you disagree, you’re an extremist. Not a label, apparently.


28 posted on 12/14/2010 6:29:03 AM PST by Jabba the Nutt (Are they insane, stupid or just evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl
" 'No Labels' Group Meets......"

This group of losers is so pathetic and their "platform" so sophomoric that it defies description.

Did they hold their first meeting in the game arcade at the mall?

Leni

29 posted on 12/14/2010 6:29:43 AM PST by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eroteme

Everyone always figures out what’s in the can of crap.
That’s why they keep changing what they “prefer to be called”.


30 posted on 12/14/2010 6:33:42 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

I love all the leftist buzz words in the ‘no labels’ mission statement: deeply, passionate, concerned, tone, crisis, purpose.


31 posted on 12/14/2010 6:36:01 AM PST by Free Vulcan (The battle isn't over. Hold their feet to the fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

“sophomoric”


I’ve said for years that “liberalism” can be summed up in the mentality of an 11 yr old girl.
To them, it’s a matter of being “mean” or “nice”.
You’re “mean” if you expect everyone to take care of themselves and their families.
You’re “nice” if you “want to help people in need”.

They don’t think ANY deeper than that.


32 posted on 12/14/2010 6:36:28 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Gondring
As long as they acknowledge that conservatism is the center, and then from there you can move either to the left or right.

THIS.

33 posted on 12/14/2010 6:38:36 AM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All

seriously, just a bunch of leftists and liberal RINOs that are worried that the rightward tilt of the country will pass them by.


34 posted on 12/14/2010 6:43:57 AM PST by newnhdad (The longest of journeys begins with one step.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

Another fascist cult. I’d bet a box of doughnuts that these white tribalist Mau-Maus support the global warming farce.


35 posted on 12/14/2010 7:37:33 AM PST by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

A liberal by any other name still fumes and reeks


36 posted on 12/28/2010 8:55:08 AM PST by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson