Note to readers...notice how Moseley posts something that backs my point entirely, yet tries to claim it supports Miss O’Donnell’s wrong response.
Don’t overlook “direct” and “unapportioned”...if it were just “income tax,” as Miss O’Donnell claimed, then there would be no need for those adjectives!
No, we were too busy laughing at you and seeing you go down in flames to notice that.
The 16th Amendment ist he constitutional basis of the income tax.
While an income tax was previously attempted, its constitutionality was doubtful, which is the reason why the 16th amendment was enacted.
Even today, people cahllenge the validity of the income tax based on their theory that the 16th Amendment was not validly ratified by the States.
If you want to spin some kook theory, go ahead. But trying to claim that Christine can’t run circles around you on the US Constitution is a different story.