Posted on 11/29/2010 7:37:16 AM PST by Elderberry
You are right my bad.
You are right my bad.
Since there was no ruling from that court in this case, the SCOTUS cannot hear it. This is the nexus of the disagreements (professional) between Lawyer Donofrio and Lawyer Apuzzo.
Apuzzo believes the SCOTUS should hear the case. Donofrio does not, and accordingly, is trying to get the Federal District Court in DC to issue a Writ of Quo Warranto (IOW, asking "by what right" does a Federal Official hold his office). The progress of Donofrio's effort is the only case worth watching. Donofrio may also be bringing suit to force the State of Hawaii to obey its own laws and release the Birth Certificate.
Donofrio's main point, and Apuzzo's, is that BHO, Jr. cannot be an NBC because his father was not a citizen. The BC would spell this out, but since BHO,Jr. has already admitted as much, its importance is somewhat diminished. The Federal District court of DC would of course, demand it for a Quo Warranto hearing, ending Hawaii's intransigence.
That court, however, is firmly in Obamanite hands, and cannot be forced to have the hearings necessary to grant the Writ and can easily drag out the proceedings until 2012.
Bottom line: BHO, Jr. is the sitting POTUS until 2012, eligible or not.
I’m an advanced scout for revolution, however, the main body of Americans are fast closing up behind me and thinking the once unthinkable.
On page 15.
A denial of Certiorari means the Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal. I have no idea what the case is about though — so couldn’t tell you what it means beyond the procedural implications.
SnakeDoc
There is no opinion, only the denial of the writ of certiorari. In this case, they allowed the amicus brief, then denied the petition. When they deny they say NOTHING. There is nothing to read. Are you referring to previously filed briefs in this case?
Rather convenient for the Supremes to have the option of not commenting, don’t you think? I wish I didn’t have to explain the reasons for my decisions to my bosses at work.
“Where’s your faith?
We all need to be praying and working. And YES, that will mean effort....”
Faith? I have loads of faith.
For field work I have faith in my 22 hornet, good for varmits up to coyotes....
For deer I believe in my 270 Winchester
Black Bear I have faith in my 30 aught 6 loaded with 180 grain bonded bullets.
For anything on two legs...my wife’s 308 is the cat’s meow.
How are the state initiatives to require birth certificate for all presidential and VP candidates to appear on the ballot? States could also define “naturally born” citizen as an individual with 2 US citizens as parents. This would provoke a SCOTUS challenge if states refused to certify candidates.
ballot access during the DEM primaries must require proof of eligibility, too. get the issue going early in 2012.
Nazi Pelosi creates a fraudulent (criminal) certification for Hawaii's DNC who first refused to give "green" light for the illegal alien an usurper pResident's in OUR W.H. NBC status. Congress get fooled by political hack Jack Maskell!!
Eight members of SCOTUS get a "surprise" visit by the usurper on January 14, 2009 and meeting is "telegraphed" to the lower judicial court system of that "threat" to accepting sweeping the Constitutional crisis and justice under the rug!!!
Who knows, maybe the Wiki-Leaks has the goods on Barry Soetoro if even that is one of his real names or person who is "Fundamentally Transforming the United States of America into a Marxist's dictatorship???
there was talk of him doin sumptin on this-about 18 months ago...and then he seemed to cop-out on it, and picked up the Chrysler case....
Rather convenient for the Supremes to have the option of not commenting, don’t you think? I wish I didn’t have to explain the reasons for my decisions to my bosses at work.
The Supreme Court sometimes does list their reasons for denying cert but since they now routinely receive 8,400 petitions a year and they only grant cert (agree to hear) in about one percent of them, they rarely list their reasons.
Yeah, there’s the “rule of four” but we don’t know that “Scalia, Robberts, Thomas and Alito” (and Kennedy) all were against granting cert. Three of them could have been in favor, and we’ll never know.
This is terrible. This was the most well put together cases to hit the SCOTUS than any other case thus far. It took directly two years for it to reach the SCOTUS from it’s initial filing right before he was inaugurated which gave them standing. This again is bad because if another case was filed, it would take probably two years to make it back to the SCOTUS and by then his 1st term would be up and the Palin will be smoking him in the debates to become the next president. Now with that said, we have another case that is being reintroduced and that is the Hollister case against Obama which was dismissed because a Judge said it was discussed on Twitter.
Twitter Eligibility Case
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=233177
Donofrio was not initially interested in the Hawaiian BC case, but after becoming interested, he found no one to pay the freight for the lawsuit. Those who have tried bringing the State to court in order to get the documents to which the law entitles them, have run into one legal snag after another. The State is clearly stonewalling.
To put it in logical order, Donofrio is hoping the Federal District court in DC will order the documents. But that court is stonewalling him ... so it's back to Hawaii .... I guess.
Donofrio's greatest fear is not Obama. He fears that the unconstitutionality of ineligible candidates will further erode the Constitution... and that the matter must be settled .. Obama or no Obama. We cannot let the anti-Constitution people use this as a bogus "precedent."
2012 will tell the tale. One state must step up and keep Obama off the ballot to force everyone's hand.
“it shouldn’t be too much effort for “we the people” to “encourage” our states to pass eligibility proof standards for getting on the ballot in 2012.”
Excellent!
This is exactly the type of thing I was referring to....and there’s more that cam be accomplished as well. ;-)
The Constitution is the boss.
At least in the country I’ve known and loved, which is no more.
This was totally predictable. Does signal to me, though, that the reason for SCOTUS “evading” the issue wasn’t in order to have Republicans in control of Congress before deciding the issue. That pretty much leaves the Soros economic threats as the probable reason for evading it, which also explains the military, Congress, Hawaii DOH, federal and state law enforcement systems, and media evading it as well.
It’s a coup. Obama is the puppet of the Soros communist-Islamist cabal. Just watch and see if that doesn’t explain everything you observe.
Lots of folks think it, few say it. Well said.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.