Replies

The NYT doesn't even know any "Wealthy, College-Educated, Republicans" or anyone that could interview such folks. They went and interviewed a bunch of what they call "blue dog" democrats and reported the results under a different heading to buttress their argument against anyone not a part of the "right crowd". It's part of the same propaganda campaign as the "blue blood" Republicans vs the rest of us. They've only got two years to do what it took them six years to do leading up to 2008 so they're hard at it.

The so-called "Blue Blood" Republicans may indeed be inclined to a degree of elitism, but no where nearly so much as the most moderate democrat. The less often we join in the debates fostered and headlined by the democrat media the better off we'll be. There's plenty of time to have internal battles after every RINO and democrat is out of power and we're in control of the Senate, the House, and the Presidency.

Until then, we have to keep our noses to the grindstone taking over the local party machinery and let RINOs and "blue bloods" get with the program or become a marginalized minority within the party. If they can't deal with not being the driving force within the party they'll either have to start a new republocrat party or become democrat, and if they become democrat they need banished from public life forever along with the rest of the fascist democrat scum.

Let the NYT and the other democrat propaganda organs thrash about trying to gain traction with their attempts to generate distracting internal strife. Don't give them the satisfaction of joining in the battles they pick for us to fight against one another.

JMHO

Regards