Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BobL
I really think permanent bases on the Moon and Mars will need to be burrowed into the soil. Advantages are protection from external hits and radiaton, as well as moderation of extreme temperature fluctuations. Besides, there is nothing on the surface we can use, but there may be water and minerals to be found beneath the surface.

The first permanent lunar base may be visible only by the solar array above it, collecting energy.

4 posted on 11/24/2010 4:54:59 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: hinckley buzzard

“I really think permanent bases on the Moon and Mars will need to be burrowed into the soil. “

I agree on the Moon, maybe not so much on Mars. In any case, we’ll see what the Chinese and Russians come up with - hopefully they’ll have streaming and a translator for us.

Any thoughts on Dancing with the Stars?


5 posted on 11/24/2010 4:59:11 PM PST by BobL (The whole point of being human is knowing when the party's over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: hinckley buzzard

I agree that underground is the way to go, but there are some other things that can go on the surface as well, such as high gain antennas.

There is also value in partial protection on the surface. Assuming there are some nuclear reactors available, cut stone walls can provide “outdoor storage”, to reduce damage to equipment, and eventually such cut stone can be used to make landing pads. There would also probably be permanent tethered weather balloons for Martian atmospheric studies and over the horizon communications.


9 posted on 11/24/2010 5:21:41 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson