Watch out what you wish for. The inconclusive proof you request may cost real lives. I prefer for it to go on in dispute, as inconclusive proof that was harmless is unlikely.
Meanwhile, go on accusing your fellows of being idiots, because that seems to be your main argument.
"Meanwhile, go on accusing your fellows of being idiots, because that seems to be your main argument."
I believe it was you who first stated that anyone who took a look at this photo and could conclude it was an airliner lacked brains. Did you not infer that? Many people with a basic knowledge of wind and temps at altitude can indeed conclude from this photo that it is an airliner. Just because you can't, doesn't mean others can't.
I believe it was you who first stated that anyone who took a look at this photo and could conclude it was an airliner lacked brains. Did you not infer that? Many people with a basic knowledge of wind and temps at altitude can indeed conclude from this photo that it is an airliner. Just because you can't, doesn't mean others can't.