Posted on 11/01/2010 12:36:34 PM PDT by American Dream 246
Chief Justice John Roberts, U.S. Supreme Court.
According to sources who watch the inner workings of the federal government, a smackdown of Barack Obama by the U.S. Supreme Court may be inevitable.
Ever since Obama assumed the office of President, critics have hammered him on a number of Constitutional issues.
Critics have complained that much, if not all of Obama's major initiatives run headlong into Constitutional roadblocks on the power of the federal government.
Obama certainly did not help himself in the eyes of the Court when he used the venue of the State of the Union address early in the year to publicly flog the Court over its ruling that the First Amendment grants the right to various organizations to run political ads during the time of an election.
The tongue-lashing clearly did not sit well with the Court, as demonstrated by Justice Sam Alito, who publicly shook his head and stated under his breath, 'That's not true,'when Obama told a flat-out lie concerning the Court's ruling.
As it has turned out, this was a watershed moment in the relationship between the executive and the judicial branches of the federal government. Obama publicly declared war on the court, even as he blatantly continued to propose legislation that flies in the face of every known Constitutional principle upon which this nation has stood for over 200 years. Obama has even identified Chief Justice John Roberts as his number one enemy, that is, apart from Fox News and Rush Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, and so on. And it is no accident that the one swing-vote on the court, Justice Anthony Kennedy, stated recently that he has no intention of retiring until 'Obama is gone.'
Apparently, the Court has had enough.
The Roberts Court has signaled, in a very subtle manner, of course, that it intends to address the issues about which Obama critics have been screaming to high heaven. A ruling against Obama on any one of these important issues could potentially cripple the Administration. Such a thing would be long overdue.
First
there is ObamaCare, which violates the Constitutional principle barring the federal government from forcing citizens to purchase something. And no, this is not the same thing as states requiring drivers to purchase car insurance, as some of the intellectually-impaired claim.
The Constitution limits FEDERAL government, not state governments, from such things, and further, not everyone has to drive, and thus, a citizen could opt not to purchase car insurance by simply deciding not to drive a vehicle.
In the ObamaCare world, however, no citizen can 'opt out.'
Second
sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama's history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President.
The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii.
And that is only the tip of the iceberg.
Third,
several cases involving possible criminal activity, conflicts of interest, and pay-for-play cronyism could potentially land many Administration officials, if not Obama himself, in hot water with the Court.
Frankly, in the years this writer has observed politics, nothing comes close to comparing with the rampant corruption of this Administration, not even during the Nixon years.
Nixon and the Watergate conspirators look like choirboys compared to the jokers that populate this Administration.
In addition, the Court will eventually be forced to rule on the dreadful decision of the Obama DOJ suing the state of Arizona.
That, too, could send the Obama doctrine of open borders to an early grave, given that the Administration refuses to enforce federal law on illegal aliens.
And finally, the biggie that could potentially send the entire house of cards tumbling in a free-fall is the latest revelation concerning the Obama-Holder Department of Justice and its refusal to pursue the New Black Panther Party.
The group was caught on tape committing felonies by attempting to intimidate Caucasian voters into staying away from the polls.
A whistle-blower who resigned from the DOJ is now charging Holder with the deliberate refusal to pursue cases against Blacks, particularly those who are involved in radical hate-groups, such as the New Black Panthers, who have been caught on tape calling for the murder of white people and their babies.
This one is a biggie that could send the entire Administration crumbling--that is, if the Justices have the guts to draw a line in the sand at the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
I’ll believe it when I see it - SCOTUS acting on any of this.
I know five will take him on. The other 4 are commie RATS. (i know taht’s redundant).
Please make this be true.
Recall when the administration complained about the constitution removal of of a central american leader who decided to outstay his constitution term of office? Methinks that was an omen of what is going to happen here. Patriots, be ready!
” Our New Dictator May Be In Deep Trouble with SCOTUS “
How can he be, with his ‘Wise Latina Woman’ in place to show the old white men the error of their ways??
Having the SCOTUS rule on court cases that arise years afterward (which is what the court does now) may be useful, but that's not what the Court should be focused on.
Holding the other two branches to the limits imposed by the Constitution is the main thing.
Remember the state of the union address. These justices have a good long memory. Obama is not American, even if he has a BC. The wheels are falling off all at the same time. Tomorrow is the beginning.
Can the SCOTUS act on it’s own accord? Activist?
Don’t cases have to be brought before them?
Me too, SCOTUS isn’t going to do anything dramatic.
“This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii.”
My, my...wouldn’t we all like to know more about this. So we can assume he lied to the FBI about any criminal history when he was running for office.
SCOTUS will most likely have to deal with the 0bamacare deal and the Arizona law. In fact, the SCOTUS should have been the competent jurisdiction when 0bama sued Arizona.
I do not see them getting into the qualification issue at all. Under the Constitution that issue and issues of 0bama crimes are the jurisdiction of Congress. They could rule in favor of disclosure of some hidden 0bama records under the existing FOIA rules. But the power to investigate and prosecute 0bama administration crimes rests on Congress.
Excellent post.
Exactly. While this article may make interesting reading, the author isn’t familiar with how the judicial system operates.
Ping!
BFL
Rumors Run Amok.
I don’t see how rocking the seat of government can be made to help republicans at a time where we have not yet won, but will, have not yet had even a single meeting to scramble an agenda to govern, have not yet cleared the deck on who’s going to be whom in the Republican leadership in Congress, have not yet managed the demands of the Tea Party with the reality of owning possibly only 1/2 of ONE branch of three branches of government.
Pray we don’t explode our future by running amok with glee, overeach and arrogance. We have to have 2012. To get it, we have got to be coherent in both determination and TONE, and learn to govern in a near 40% marxist country!
what sources?
What proof that SCOTUS is quietly accepting info on Obama’s birth?
bfl
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.