Who is going to read that one sided slanted story?
Odds are, it will be required reading in many a course.
Say, didn't the then-president of CU resign when it became obvious that Churchill was an academic con artist and it was going to be a very messy situation.
She [the then-president] was probably torn between doing the right thing, and her future liberal paymasters.
I did because I got to read about Churchill getting what he deserved. A liar, cheat, plagiarizing, low-life far leftist, whiney fraud. That $1 can buy him a value meal at McD's. Great story, by the way. Please reconsider and read it.
The same people who’ll buy Jimmah Cahtah’s rewrite of history.