[P-Marlowe]

I agree. I also think it's beyond that. I think lb has problems.

This thread was a classic study in straw man argument.

LB kept putting words in your mouth and then arguing with his own words rather than even looking to see what you were saying. That is why when I came on this thread I just couldn't figure out what you guys were arguing about. YOU weren't arguing about anything. LB was just arguing with himself while at the same time calling you a Satanist for claiming to say what you quite obviously never said or even hinted at.

Maybe LB should set up another account with another Freeper name and then he can argue with himself all day long.

[LomanBill]

[calling you a Satanist for claiming to say what you quite obviously never said or even hinted at.]

 

Really, called him a "Satanist" did I?  Nope.

xzins:  The logic is: Since "love" does no harm to its neighbor, love fulfills the law.
   
LomanBill: That sounds a lot like the logic Aliester Crowley applies in "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law. Love is the law, love under will."; and it sounds a lot like the Gnostic gospel that elements of the ELCA and other denominations, who condone homosexual behavior, are selling.  

 

How would you differentiate Crowley's logic and "love" from Romans 13:10?

 

xzins: "Well, uhhh, uhhh, Paul wrote Romans 13:10".  Wah wah wah, (pings the xzins peanut gallery fan club) LomanBill called me a Satanist!

 

P-Marlowe {in Beavix/Buthead voice}:  Ha hah, he said Satanist.  You can't type.  I'm witty.  Ha hah.

 

 

[xzins]

Maybe LB should set up another account with another Freeper name and then he can argue with himself all day long.

LOL!