[mrsmith]

Sometimes the news isn't good. Crosstabs at the link.

[mrsmith]

Sigh, every week he’s on the news announcing some new federal project “he brought” to the district!
The area is so poor but has so much potential you’d think it would occur to someone that he’s giving away a whole lot more than he’s getting. But no. He’s as fat and safe a tick as Pelosi.

Here’s a link to Griffith’s latest ad. It’s one with Obama saying “I love Rick Boucher “ over and over:
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/JillianBandes/2010/09/29/virginia_house_races_stock_up_on_donkey_pinatas

Well, there’s still hope.This looks to be a transformational election year.

[onyx]

Which state?

[cripplecreek]

We won’t win them all but if we win the majority of them it will be good for all.

[gusopol3]

Gosh, that Boucher is a liar right out of the box. The adjournment was a “non-issue?” How could that be when 38 Dems voted against Evita?

[Longbow1969]

This is the kind of polling that convinces me that American’s attitudes about the social welfare state simply has not changed very much. Sadly, US citizens still seem to support big government.

[Qbert]

He voted for cap and trade, and the big bailouts:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2406579/posts

[Corin Stormhands]

I still think it’s an uphill climb for Griffith, but the modeling on this poll is skewed from Survey USA’s last poll of the district.

This is heavily weighted for Democrat turnout. I don’t see that happening.

[Darnright]

In the days of Clinton's impeachment, the republicans had amassed a large amount of evidence against Slick Willie. One of the democrats that never looked at the evidence was lawyer Rick Boucher.