Not you! You normally think. Tell me you read the article at the link.
Other than your Kline obsession, I have found your posts well reasoned.
Oh yeah, I read it. It was almost laughable. We’re supposed to believe that the cop who fired the fatal shot was close enough to see the victim had bloodshot eyes but not close enough to see that his gun was in a holster? I remember reading the transcript the dispatcher shortly after it happened but I don’t remember any caution about the victim being a Green Beret - that was a convenient addition to the story, wasn’t it? There are so many holes in the testimony that you could sell it for swiss cheese.