Posted on 09/11/2010 1:05:39 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
I’m thinking of Georgia Tech for my 16 yr. old daughter who is aiming high for Chemical Engineering. #31 on the list although we’d be out-of-state unless we could manage to get that waived. That vs. CalTech or MIT, I think Georgia Tech is a good bargain for your buck.
http://www.payscale.com/education/average-cost-for-college-ROI
“..and for that 22K difference per year, in 6 years the guy with no college will still be making $28K and the guy who originally made $50K per year has paid off his debt and has moved up to making $75K”
Your analysis is over simplified. The costs of higher education have substantially increased and the value in many areas has decreased. The analysis has changed dramatically in the last 10 years.
The issue involves obtaining the level of training necessary for a rewarding career. A side issue is having the mindset to adapt to changing conditions in employment and skill sets as you age. The current higher education model is a cottage industry, highly inefficient and resistant to change. Higher education should be going through the same types of gut wrenching changes as the news business. Instead, higher education, facilitated by large government subsidies and barriers to entry for competitors, is stagnant. For example, online education is an innovation of the internet age. The university model of online education involves higher costs than the traditional classroom model.
A new mindset and new competitors should embrace commodization of content, standardization of assessment, unbundling of related services, and lower cost labor. All these elements can combine to lower costs, improve accessibility, and maintain quality for large numbers of students. The technology is available now for a revolution in higher education. Entrenched mindsets, government subsidies, and a lack of development capital hinder the effort.
RE: Neither one of them would have ever been happy working for the man.
Hope he does not have to pay off any onerous college loans.
To simplify my point, suppose that the loan has no interest. $150,000/6 = $25,000, so that $50-$75K/year salary becomes a $25K-$50K/year salary. (If you're not going to pay that much in the first few years, then of course you'll have to pay more in the later years if you want to pay the $150K off in six years.) A single individual can live a decent life with a $25K/year salary in a low cost-of-living location, but luxuries will have to be foregone unless said individual wants to substitute student loan debt for credit card debt.
Excellent observation! There are many professions that now require a college degree just to be eligible to take the exams necessary to enter the professor. CPAs come to mind.
Trust me. Most people who have their pedigrees ain’t that smart.
At least in Kalifornia. Probably NY too.
HS graduate required at entry.
Reading, Learning and a belief that your greatest job skill is solving problems.
A tradesman, like an electrician, charges $80-90/hr and has more orders than he can fulfill. If he works about 2,000 hours per year (which is the usual 8 hour work day, 5 days a week) then he earns about $160K, pre-tax. Very few engineers even come close to this income. Also, since he is a business, he can use tax deductions for many items. He is his own boss, works flexible hours, takes a vacation whenever he wants, and will not be laid off. His job is also not going to be outsourced to Bangalore. What is there to not like?
The college not only costs you money, it also costs you time. A 4-year college costs you $150K in fees, and it costs you $600K in lost opportunity (compared to that electrician as an example.) Now that is some real money.
A college is required if you want to become an engineer or a scientist. The knowledge that engineers need, math in particular, is almost too difficult to comprehend on your own, without a teacher. Some manage that, but most will not. Also without a well developed course plan you don't even know what you need to know until you hit your head against the wall. So if you dream of becoming a chemist and working for Big Pharma, you'd better get the proper education. Even if you are good, a large company isn't going to give you a comprehensive exam - they don't need to if there are other applicants who already passed those exams in their schools.
But outside of that, a good number of occupations does not require formal education. This is doubly so if the person majors in something fashionable but utterly useless, like ancient hieroglyphics. But if you get a materials science diploma, for example, many doors will be open to you.
Bill Gates dropped out of college.
That is just ridiculous. Study and study says that you will make more money with a college education than stopping at the high school level. Yes there are some majors that probably should be avoided but overall you make more money with a decent degree. The only thing I would accept for my four children “taking time off” waiting to get their degree would be the military. That is it. I can’t see having them taking a year or so off to find themselves would be a good idea. I have seen this happen to many times and then the kids never go to school at all. Again personal choice that the family makes. Obviously there is the “they are 18 years old” saying but hopefully you raise them right to take your opinion on important matters. I know they certainly don’t accept our opinions on what clothes they have to wear, music, tv shows, movies and many other areas, but hopefully the biggies they will listen.
He got some scholarship money and paid the rest as he went.
His new bride does owe on college loans, but they
are paying those off as fast as they can.
Well I’ll simply argue what matters is what you can do - college or no college. What you can do is based on your willingness to learn and work hard. The lack of college can make it more difficult to get through that initial job door, but once through that door it matters little more if you are good at what you do.
And the bottom line is, those who love what they do succeed at what they do - college or no college.
I never went to college and I retired at age 52. No, I didn’t inherit any money. Just hard work, 70-80 hr weeks for awhile, sticking to my savings/investment plan and a bit of luck.
“...you don’t even know what you need to know until you hit your head against the wall.”
Sooo true.
There is a place for vocational training, just as there is a place for classical learning. Both have value. I've studied Plato and Kant and managed to have a successful corporate business career. ...And hunt, fish and expouse conservative values.
In addition, many kids are not motivated or smart enough to be college material. As long as mom and dad pays, it's party time. Add to that the preferred minorities taking up seat that should be going to qualified MOTIVATED students who aren't the right color. Many college degrees today aren't woth the paper they're written on.
Quite frankly, I would think long and hard about sending a kid to college these days. I know many pafrents who are sick about sending off their precious progeny only to get back a flaming Lib with no saleable skills, and they paid out their life savings to have their kid brain-washed..
Or you can spend 10 years in Ivy League schools, come out dumb as gravel, become a White House czar and help to destroy the best country in the world in less than 2 years time. All while getting paid 6 figures and getting free transportation anywhere in the world.
Now that’s a gravy job.
There's the key. Owning your own business if done properly is like owning a money tree and a printing press along with the plates to print your own money.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.