Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BP's Deepwater Horizon - Oil to Stay Put; Dispersant Questions - and Open Thread (Aug 1, 2010)
The Oil Drum ^ | August 1, 2010 - 10:20am | Gail the Actuary

Posted on 08/01/2010 8:09:59 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Last week, NOAA released a new study showing that the dispersed oil was not likely to travel far.

In order for the oil to be dispersed very far, it would need to reach the Loop Current. At this point in time, the Loop Current is very far away, and there seems to be little chance the oil will travel that far.

According to the report:

Overflights in the past week have found only scattered patches of light sheen near the Mississippi Delta – an indication that aggressive efforts to capture and disperse the oil have been effective and that the remaining oil is naturally dispersing and biodegrading.

Around May 24, a large loop current eddy, called Eddy Franklin, started to “pinch off” and detach, from the loop current. For a number of weeks, Eddy Franklin and the loop current showed varying levels of connectivity. The eddy is now clearly disconnected from the loop current and will likely migrate to the west over the next few months.


(Excerpt) Read more at theoildrum.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: bp; deephorz; deepwaterhorizon; energy; offshore; oil; oilspill

1 posted on 08/01/2010 8:10:01 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

According to previous MSM reports, the loop current should have engulfed the entire east coast of Florida with foot thick coverings of oil, inundating and destroying all life forms there forever.


2 posted on 08/01/2010 8:14:14 AM PDT by Rennes Templar (They shall not pass!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

How long does it take for crude oil to biodegrade? 1-2 years? 5? more?


3 posted on 08/01/2010 8:20:37 AM PDT by theDentist (fybo; qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspelll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theDentist
How long does it take for crude oil to biodegrade? 1-2 years? 5? more?

Good question, lots of variables. The temperature of the water is key, because we're talking about a biological process. Also, the effectiveness of the dispersant is critical ... the better dispersed the oil, the more surface area for the oleophilic microbes to digest.

People are discovering the oil is mostly "gone" now .. from this leak. What people don't realize is that oil leaks in the the oceans every day in significant quantities ... always has since the earth was formed ... and that's how the oleophilics were "there" to solve the problem.

The whole process of dispersants and bio tech is explained at The Patriot's Flag - Dispersants and the Piper. It is a simple process ... one that has been in place for eons and is simply enhanced by the dispersants. And much to the chagrin of the environmentalist Left ... it has worked perfectly.

4 posted on 08/01/2010 8:36:55 AM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag (http://www.thepatriotsflag.com - The Patriot's Flag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; theDentist
“On June 16, Markey notes, BP told the Coast Guard that its use of Corexit had never exceeded 3,365 gallons in any recent day.
Yet e-mails to Congress told a different story. In fighting the Gulf oil spill on June 12 and 13,
the e-mails noted, BP used 14,305 gallons 36,000 gallons respectively.”

5 posted on 08/01/2010 8:37:58 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Article IV - Section 4 - The United States shall protect each of them against Invasion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Who knows who are what to believe anymore...this happened, that happend, it will do this, it will do that......


6 posted on 08/01/2010 8:51:43 AM PDT by gulfcoast6 (GOD IS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I dunno why they have such a hard time accepting the idea that maybe the Little Wee Beasties (microbes) simply multiplied due to the high availability of food (the oil) and lunched a lot of it down.

Like Nature hasn’t had long enough to evolve an Oil Eating Wee Beastie? Of course it has. And natural seeps have been occurring since before humans existed — and if not lunched away by something, would still be around.

Clearly, Mother Nature has a better handle on this than we know.


7 posted on 08/01/2010 8:57:18 AM PDT by William of Barsoom (In Omnia, Paratus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Interesting this "nightmare scenario" posted here which essentially comes down to too much oil. It just seems like the best thing to do is start producing this well as the current status of the well is that pressure is slowly rising. Why is that not even considered an option?


8 posted on 08/01/2010 9:54:40 AM PDT by RushingWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThePatriotsFlag

See #5.

Foxnews was highlighting this Sunday morning... Markey’s accusations against BP and the Coast Guard.


9 posted on 08/01/2010 10:58:54 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RushingWater
You found it....there was heavy discussion on that DoomsDay scenario on the oil Drum....for others:

BP Macondo Blowout - Static Top Kill vs. Bottom Kill: Weighing the Risks

10 posted on 08/01/2010 11:04:15 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RushingWater
From a comment ...see link at post #10...

************************************EXCERPT********************************************

But Lim's article has many other flaws. He expends lots of words on the ridiculous speculation that BP executives sold shares because they knew a blowout was imminent. He doesn't understand that lost circulation is a common problem. He harps on the "two wells" A and B. In short, the usual garbage.

11 posted on 08/01/2010 11:07:27 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

More maps:

http://www.deepwaterhorizonresponse.com/go/doctype/2931/53979/


12 posted on 08/01/2010 11:08:57 AM PDT by GOPJ (..Liberalism is Intolerance..- - Freeper Eric in the Ozarks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RushingWater
Much discussion at the link...post #10 (for others )

from:GeoNola on July 31, 2010 - 1:39pm

Totally bogus, but highly entertaining (cf. "pervious updipping beds").

And no, Macondo is not on a salt dome flank.

Subthread from several days ago:

bignerd on July 29, 2010 - 5:44pm ,/b>

Any geophys types out there?

Nicked this screen grab off Kent Wells' presentation of 21st July.

A ropey looking line of 2D seismic but its all I've seen to date.

Whats the strong reflector just below 20,000 ft? Is that salt? Seems to provide some structure in the overlying sediments.

13 posted on 08/01/2010 11:18:16 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RushingWater
Now we have dualing Geological maps,...which one is the true map?....

Several posters on TOD believe Lim is totally wrong...but the map is from BP.

However there are maps at some of the Universities,...saw those quite some time ago but didn't study them in any detail.

14 posted on 08/01/2010 11:23:27 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver; BOBTHENAILER; SunkenCiv; Marine_Uncle; onyx; NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; ...

fyi


15 posted on 08/01/2010 11:27:29 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Thanks.


16 posted on 08/01/2010 11:28:29 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

:) My fave: http://www.deepwaterhorizonresponse.com/posted/2931/20100801Houma0261_Daily_Oil_Impact_Assessment_Day103_HOUMA_email_1_.838239.pdf


17 posted on 08/01/2010 11:35:01 AM PDT by GOPJ (..Liberalism is Intolerance..- - Freeper Eric in the Ozarks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

The news Media would have viewers believe all of the beaches and marshes were under a foot thick layer of oil crude.


18 posted on 08/01/2010 11:42:15 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
He expends lots of words on the ridiculous speculation that BP executives sold shares because they knew a blowout was imminent.

I can't vouch for the geological edge he portrays, but it does appear that BP executives sold a ton of shares when the well was going so badly in March that it was just going to be cemented in. Too bad it wasn't . . . for some reason??
19 posted on 08/01/2010 3:50:40 PM PDT by RushingWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Gotta hit the rack. Looks like tomorrow we shall see if the top static kill is successful or not. As for Markely, the guy is as bad as the clowns from the global warming crowd that try to mislead people into thinking CO2 is a toxic harmful gas. Liars beget liars.
20 posted on 08/01/2010 4:21:20 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson