Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tempest

the article is prolly right

there are 7 rich guys with huge loans and one aint payin up
and there are 1200000 middle class home owners and 12k of em arnt payin up. Still 1 n 7 and 1 n 12 respectively.

sooooo the ole NYT just adjust the ole ratio and presents the numbers in a way that suites them.

sadly there are idiots that will allow the nyt to lead them to a preditermined conclusion.


17 posted on 07/08/2010 10:47:44 PM PDT by Casaubon (Internet Research Ninja Masta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Casaubon

no not really

http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2010/07/09/business/09rich_graphic.html?ref=economy


32 posted on 07/08/2010 11:01:23 PM PDT by Tempest (I give up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Casaubon
sadly there are idiots that will allow the nyt to lead them to a preditermined conclusion.

The New York Times ceased to be a credible source for factual information starting in 1896 when Adolph Ochs bought it from Henry Raymond. The Ochs family and in-laws (Orvil [sic] Dryfoos and the Sulzberger) have controlled it ever since.

A case can be made that Timesman Herbert Matthews was instrumental in the rise of Castro. Later Times reporters, such as David Halberstam and Harrison Salisbury, were part of the disinformation campaign that turned America against our troops in Vietnam.

The New York Times is a leftist organ and virtually anything appearing within its pages should be treated with a healthy dose of skepticism, IMHO.

45 posted on 07/08/2010 11:16:59 PM PDT by re_nortex (DP...that's what I like about Texas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson