Skip to comments.Stanfield teacher arrested for sexual misconduct with a minor (Photo: Guilty)
Posted on 07/02/2010 11:58:26 AM PDT by Mikey_1962
click here to read article
They know she's fugly and therefore guilty.
Can we stop playing the guilty/innocent game based upon the attractiveness of the accused...at least when we’re talking about sexual assault on children??
If they committed such a crime, their looks are irrelevant and they deserve the harshest punishment allowable.
Not quite a Mary Kay Letourneau, is she
She looks fine to me either way but a pervert.
Pretty guilty, I guess they’d call it.
Let's hope these officers were getting in some practice for border duty.
Wonder why they didn’t stop the rape fom happening?
She is kinda cute. We need additional information. Has she done this before? Is this a first time offense? Sheesh! Just kidding. She should be made to pay for her offense.
So how many so far this month?
What an over sexed country.
“Can we stop playing the guilty/innocent game based upon the attractiveness of the accused...at least when were talking about sexual assault on children??
If they committed such a crime, their looks are irrelevant and they deserve the harshest punishment allowable.”
We know that. We’re just having some fun.
oh come on. judging whether or not there was real “abuse” should take into account attractiveness. a hot teacher that any adolescent male would give his eye teeth to schtupp is probably not actually abusing him.
however no matter what they look like, they obviously have something wrong upstairs.
Using night vision goggles from a distance, the officers observed two individuals in the vehicle appearing to have consensual sexual intercourse.
Makes you wonder, doesn’t it. Should we be more worried about what two people are doing in the dark, or two cops doggedly determined to find out what that might be?
Is it just me, or is the link the funniest thing I will see today?
At the link with the story and the mug shot of the teacher who had sex with her student, there is an animated advertisement below.
It starts with jungle leaves which open to show an astonished kid with binoculars. Then come the words:
“An approach so different, it will change the way you think about child care.”
Then cuts to a female teacher and a student. It ends up with the name “Childrens Learning Adventure”
I laughed. If I were then I would contact Maricopa.com and ask for my ad money back.
I’m no prude. What if it were your child?
I don’t know. It looks like a hung jury to me. I vote not guilty.
Nobody looks hot through night vision glasses though.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.