To: DoughtyOne
ROFL... so stating Facts is now a smear. this statement of yours has to be the stupidest I have every seen.
He proved this was an incorrect assumption with Reagan, Bush, and Bush again.
bush 1 and bush 2 were no conservatives. They were not as big a liberals as say Obama or Clinton but they were and are still liberals esp when it comes to governmental spending.
In fact McCain's actions as well as JD's action in 2000-2006 prove my point. when the liberal bush was in office both Men acted like RINO's. I find it amusing that you spend so much effort in supporting one RINO over the other and attacking the only conservative on the national stage. but small minds tend to not see the big picture.
433 posted on
06/12/2010 1:40:25 PM PDT by
unseen1
To: unseen1
434 posted on
06/12/2010 1:44:00 PM PDT by
Jim Robinson
(JUST VOTE THEM OUT! teapartyexpress.org)
To: unseen1; mkjessup; DoughtyOne
” I find it amusing that you spend so much effort in supporting one RINO over the other and attacking the only conservative on the national stage. but small minds tend to not see the big picture. “
Hayworth has a 98% lifetime ACU rating, and you are a bare-faced liar.
To: unseen1
Youre still an idiot.
434 posted on Saturday, June 12, 2010 1:44:00 PM by Jim Robinson
Oh yeah, and this too ;-)
436 posted on
06/12/2010 1:59:00 PM PDT by
stephenjohnbanker
(Support our troops....and vote out the RINOS!)
To: unseen1
ROFL... so stating Facts is now a smear. this statement of yours has to be the stupidest I have every seen.
You stated that Hayworth took Abramoff funds under the Pay to Play Scandle. Okay, well Hayworth was not prosecuted or found guilty of anything. So what you posted was only half the truth wasn't it.
You sought to smear Hayworth. You sought to say he was unfit for office, because of the smear. And no matter how many times you post ROFL to me, it doesn't change your deceit so that it is acceptable.
He proved this was an incorrect assumption with Reagan, Bush, and Bush again.
bush 1 and bush 2 were no conservatives. They were not as big a liberals as say Obama or Clinton but they were and are still liberals esp when it comes to governmental spending.
Except for one thing... McCain took these folks to task on Conservative policy. When it came to Leftist policy, he was their best friend.
No, Bush1 and Bush2 were not what I would call a steady Conservative, but they make John McCain look like Carl Marx, Vladimir Lenin, and Mao by comparison.
In fact McCain's actions as well as JD's action in 2000-2006 prove my point. when the liberal bush was in office both Men acted like RINO's. I find it amusing that you spend so much effort in supporting one RINO over the other and attacking the only conservative on the national stage. but small minds tend to not see the big picture.
You know, you're just flat ass lying now. Any time you like, you can check this out: http://www.hotr.us/data/mccainagain.html
J.D. Hayworth is a good man. You are running cover for John McCain, and since you can't defend him, you have to smear Hayworth.
Why don't you quit wasting our time and realize nobody but nobody is buying your bildge, unless they're trying to do the same thing you are. And folks can see it.
443 posted on
06/12/2010 7:11:26 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(J. D. Hayworth, the next Senator, the Great State of Arizona - Sen. Poopdeck, Panama is calling...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson