"I don’t approve of violence but it is going to take more than sign carrying and flag waving to take back this country"
What the heck is that supposed to mean? You essentially say 'I don't approve of what he did but tea parties don't work but maybe what he did will.' Forgive me if I misunderstood.
Now for your claim that some keyboard-Achilles here boast of future-feats of civil-disobedience. If any such folks are reading this, be advised that such behavior is a great way to get FR closed down and yourselves in jail.
Lets take this country back legally, peacefully, without using intimidation. Or else we are no better that the corrupt people that we claim to abhor.
What are you, the post police now?
Legal means work when the law is being applied without corruption. Any case that even got close to getting Obama to release his birth certificate got swiftly stamped on by a corrupt judiciary.
How can electoral means work when the electoral rules are being applied corruptly? The Constitution says that only a natural born citizen may stand for election as President. This has not been enforced.
So what legal means were you proposing?