Obama - "We can not continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a Civilian National Security force - that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded as our Military".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwaAVJITx1Y
sickening...
To: broken_arrow1
These numbers don't approach the perhaps hyperbolic remark by candidate Obama in July 2008 that "[w]e've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded [as our military]." Exactly what is the justification for having a civilian national security force as well-funded as our military? We have many "security forces" already, like the State Militia, the National Guard, volunteer organizations, etc.
It sounds sinister to me.
2 posted on
06/09/2010 3:53:38 AM PDT by
olezip
To: broken_arrow1
Just another manifestation of the new brownshirts (purple is the new brown).
3 posted on
06/09/2010 3:56:12 AM PDT by
Oceander
(The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance -- Thos. Jefferson)
To: broken_arrow1
4 posted on
06/09/2010 4:00:30 AM PDT by
cbkaty
(Never yield to force. Never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy---W Churchill)
To: broken_arrow1
“Blue-State Bonanza for Americorps Funding (250,000 - Obama’s KGB Civilian National Security Force)”
Yes, they’ll join king obuma’s fearsome Fat Welfare Momma Division and the deadly New York City metrosexual brigade and march down south to hit Texans over their heads with poodles and purses.
To: broken_arrow1; ExTexasRedhead
6 posted on
06/09/2010 6:16:10 AM PDT by
GailA
(obamacare paid for by cuts & taxes on most vulnerable Veterans, retired Military, disabled & Seniors)
To: broken_arrow1
Why do I get the impression that they will somehow be involved in get out the vote programs.
7 posted on
06/09/2010 9:54:21 AM PDT by
VRW Conspirator
(Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. - Ronald Reagan)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson