Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant
-—”A innocent party would have their lawyers DEMANDING Folks release his texts while willingly putting hers to him in the public domain. She acts guilty, so I tend not to believe her.”-—

She acts guilty by not giving this nonsense any more air time than an unconditional denial, and calling her opponents to go on record?

How much time did Bush spend attacking 9/11 Truthers, anyway? Were they on to something in your mind because he wasn't shouting “innocent” from the rooftops and suing every last one of them?

The simple truth is, if all things were essentially the same, but this was Duncan Hunter or Jim DeMint or Chuck DeVore facing the same shoddy allegations with the same shoddy evidence, you would not cease in crying foul. But because Sarah Palin endorsed Nikki Haley, Haley now has to be destroyed, even on a personal level. Same goes with Branstad. You couldn't be found talking about either of these two on a thread before Palin endorsed them after which time they instantly became your enemies.

16 posted on 06/07/2010 9:34:26 PM PDT by TitansAFC ("At that point in time (2000 race), McCain was as conservative if not more so than GWB." --- pissant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: TitansAFC

Well, if Paul O’Neill or Tom Ridge had made the accusation about 911, I think Bush might have found time to correct the record. Or better yet, if Karen Hughes or some other female that worked for Bush made allegations about an affair 2 years ago, you think he would have had the luxury of just denying it?


18 posted on 06/07/2010 9:38:24 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson