Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freespirited

I love how lawyers talk. How did they ever develop that style? So strange.


10 posted on 06/03/2010 2:56:37 PM PDT by Doc Savage (SOBAMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Doc Savage

It isn’t style. It’s gibberish. Thus ‘practice law’, ‘interpret the law’. It takes a heck of a lot of practice to interpret.

Why did New Jersey get all the toxic waste and New York got all the lawyers?

New jersey got first pick.


43 posted on 06/03/2010 4:49:15 PM PDT by bigheadfred (I said free association. Not freely associate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Doc Savage

“I love how lawyers talk. How did they ever develop that style? So strange.”

Yes, strange. But in order to convict someone of a crime you have to allege that every jot and tittle of the law has been satisfied. Thus, they basically quote the law as written and allege it has been wholly violated by the defendant. As to the “On or about”, that is defensive so a defendant can’t claim the act in question happened at 12:01 am the following day instead of 11:59 the day before. Any defect in pleading can at least delay the process as you seek to amend it. So the pleading is as inclusive as possible. It’s an art, a lousy art but an art.


49 posted on 06/03/2010 6:39:14 PM PDT by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson