Since they caught this guy.
It is only ruined if your results deviate from what pharmaceutical corporations and governments allow you to print.
Is that how this guy spread his lies for 12 years, because the all powerful drug companies crushed him unfairly?
Wakefield may have falsified data....I wouldn't know.
No kidding.
But I do know that I would never trust drug companies in these cases when they do so much behind closed doors
Like multi-million dollar research?
Our zero government doesn't lie and frame anyone, either, huh.
They lie all the time. What does that have to do with this fraud finally being exposed?
Like I say, MAYBE he did screw something up
No doubt there.
but it was NOT the conditions of the children, and the chemical findings.
What chemical findings?
It is more logical to conclude that injecting KNOWN toxins (and many are in vaccines) into small bodies will result in some negative things.
Like preventing disease and saving lives, yeah, that's terrible.
Like I say. I didn't hear the "evidence". Were you there? Was it fabricated evidence? Really? Do you think the judge was bribed? I heard about Wakefield only when I read his article in The Lancet magazine, many years ago for a class. Hardly have heard anything about him except when drug companies are trying to shut people up when scientists say there "may" be some truth to the Autism/Vaccine connection. Then THEY cite his "fraudulent" study and yadda yadda yadda. They never argue the facts. That is so suspicious, it reeks, don't you think?
Yes, BTW, I do appreciate some of the things the pharmaceutical companies have done. I have relatives in the medical field. I am NOT anti-vaccine. Yes, they have done some wonderful things, no doubt. BUT, there needs to be transparency on this vaccine issue. I don't understand why you get so angry when all I am saying is that there are too many vaccinations given to little babies. They are guinea pigs and you must know it deep inside because you are so agitated.
Take for instance the Hep. B vaccine. I think it is absolutely evil to inject that poison into babies that have no infected mother. That would be extremely easy to determine if the mother had Hep B. Yet, over 90% of babies in US have NO threat of that disease, unless they are indulging in unprotected sex, injecting themselves with drugs, etc. INSANE!!!!(But of course, the more people being injected (even when you don't need that extra poison leaching on the tiny little brains that are SOOOO vulnerable to any toxin!!!) the more money the drug companies make.
They give THREE injections of not needed CRAP into the babies within a few months of life. I think it is criminal. Absolutely criminal to inject known substances that will knowingly harm them. If they need the shot in later life, fine--if they decide they need it.
There have been doctors who have had their own children come down with Autism and their tests have shown outrageous amounts of aluminum and mercury in their brains. Urine samples after vaccines are full of toxins--some children are better able to excrete the poisons--the ones who can't, get brain damage. OK, I'm oversimplifying but you get the picture. It is easy to google any of the information. Weigh it and I think you will agree with me.
Another thing. NONE of my babies got the Hep B vaccine (5). None of them ever had flu vaccinations. None of them ever had Chicken Pox Vaccinations, etc. etc. They are all healthy young adults. None were autistic or had ANY learning disorders and garnered not only academic awards, but athletic ones. They were all reading at an early age. Do you think that would of happened if I had added 5 more vaccinations in their first few years of life? I think NOT! Why? You are putting known harmful toxins into their little bodies at a crucial time of rapid brain development when their little bodies are least able to excrete it.