“Your premise from your first post on this thread was that there were two patients who needed ventilators and only one ventilator. You wanted us to decide who got it.”
My premise is that there are limited resources and, as such, difficult choices have to be made. You are the one muddying these waters. You muddy it even more by injecting religion into it.
I understand that this is your premise, it is the same premise that has always been used to promote death panels. But the reality is that you have yet to demonstrate that it is valid.
You are the one muddying these waters.
By asking for proof? Who would you rather be when you grow up: Pelosi, Hillary or Obama?
You muddy it even more by injecting religion into it.
Actually, YOU brought it up in post #81 when you wrote:
"the injection of religion into this debate tells me more than I need to know about all of you."
All Brian had done was talk about a Catholic priest who was dehydrated to death, NOTHING would have changed if he had been an atheist.
The only time I mentioned religion was when you asked what I thought God's will was and I later remarked that the culture of death always blames Christians for getting in their way.