Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Neoliberalnot

Many liberal historians make a big deal of the fact that Lincoln appointed a lot of his Republican Rivals to the Cabinet, as that was an act of great courage. In truth, Lincoln HAD to appoint these “rivals” to his Cabinet because many of them had been promised patronage jobs in return for their votes at the Convention.

Though Lincoln received only 39 percent of the popular vote, Lincoln wouldn’t appoint anyone to his Cabinet who did not support him for President.


6 posted on 05/22/2010 3:04:11 PM PDT by AlanD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: AlanD

How much better America would have been had John Fremont won the Presidency four years earlier.


7 posted on 05/22/2010 3:24:39 PM PDT by Hoodat (.For the weapons of our warfare are mighty in God for pulling down strongholds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: AlanD
Though Lincoln received only 39 percent of the popular vote, Lincoln wouldn’t appoint anyone to his Cabinet who did not support him for President.

Lincoln also received almost 60% of the electoral votes, and would have been elected even if the Democrats had not fractured because in most of the states he won by an absolute majority.

40 posted on 05/23/2010 5:45:08 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson