Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USSR planned nuclear attack on China in 1969
The Telegraph ^ | 5/13/2010 | Andrew Osborn in Moscow and Peter Foster in Beijing

Posted on 05/13/2010 3:30:13 PM PDT by bruinbirdman

The Soviet Union was on the brink of launching a nuclear attack against China in 1969 and only backed down after the US told Moscow such a move would start World War Three, according to a Chinese historian.

The extraordinary assertion, made in a publication sanctioned by China's ruling Communist Party, suggests that the world came perilously close to nuclear war just seven years after the Cuban missile crisis.


Richard Nixon in Moscow with Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev in 1974

Liu Chenshan, the author of a series of articles that chronicle the five times China has faced a nuclear threat since 1949, wrote that the most serious threat came in 1969 at the height of a bitter border dispute between Moscow and Beijing that left more than one thousand people dead on both sides.

He said Soviet diplomats warned Washington of Moscow's plans "to wipe out the Chinese threat and get rid of this modern adventurer," with a nuclear strike, asking the US to remain neutral.

But, he says, Washington told Moscow the United States would not stand idly by but launch its own nuclear attack against the Soviet Union if it attacked China, loosing nuclear missiles at 130 Soviet cities. The threat worked, he added, and made Moscow think twice, while forcing the two countries to regulate their border dispute at the negotiating table.

He quotes Soviet ministers and diplomats at the time to bolster his claim.

On 15 October 1969, he quotes Soviet premier Alexei Kosygin as telling Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev that Washington has drawn up "detailed plans" for a nuclear war against the USSR if it attacked China.

"[The United States] has clearly indicated that China's interests are closely related to theirs and they have mapped out detailed plans for nuclear

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: china; godsgravesglyphs; nixon; nuke; soviet; ussr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 05/13/2010 3:30:13 PM PDT by bruinbirdman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
Only Nixon could go to China.

/johnny

2 posted on 05/13/2010 3:32:12 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
China probably owes us more than any other nation. We kept it from being divvied up by Europeans in the 19th century, we saved it from the Japanese and we kept them from being nuked by the Soviets.
3 posted on 05/13/2010 3:33:09 PM PDT by Tribune7 (It is immoral to claim the tea parties to be racist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

No Wonder they let Nixon into China...

They must have known about this


4 posted on 05/13/2010 3:34:27 PM PDT by Mr. K (This administration IS WEARING OUT MY CAPSLOCK KEY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

5 posted on 05/13/2010 3:37:20 PM PDT by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Remember when the president was a man? I wonder how things would turn out today.


6 posted on 05/13/2010 3:38:45 PM PDT by Spok (Free Range Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

I call BS, too many places this does not fit.


7 posted on 05/13/2010 3:40:59 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
Wasn't a Tactical Nuke used in '69? Or was that 1970?

It has been mentioned in several threads over the years.

8 posted on 05/13/2010 3:41:13 PM PDT by Deaf Smith (When a Texan takes his chances, you know chances will be taken that's for sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Just Google “Yalu River.”


9 posted on 05/13/2010 3:45:53 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

I referred to this incident in a post years ago and was attacked by some know it all freeper as an an idiot.

Wish I could remember his name. I’d ping the guy, I tell ya’.


10 posted on 05/13/2010 3:47:40 PM PDT by Skooz (Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
We should have let MacArthur have his way with them. He wanted to launch an invasion of China directly with National Chinese out of Taiwan.

Which might have been a bluff, but I bet it would have gotten the ChiCom's to back down out of Korea at the very least.

11 posted on 05/13/2010 3:50:23 PM PDT by delapaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman; Fred Nerks; Swordmaker

· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
Thanks bruinbirdman.

This story came out via a different source, sometime around 1980, possibly shortly after Breschnev kicked off. He invited Nixon to participate in a preemptive nuclear strike on China, to eliminate the threat of a nuke-equipped power which wasn't part of the Test Ban Treaty or Non-Proliferation. Nixon declined the offer, and was chilled when the Soviet leader suggested the USSR was going to go ahead and do it anyway.

Just adding to the catalog, not sending a general distribution.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

·Dogpile · Archaeologica · LiveScience · Archaeology · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google ·
· The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


12 posted on 05/13/2010 3:52:07 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delapaz
We should have let MacArthur have his way with them.

Absolutely. And Curtis LeMay should have been allowed to knock off North Vietnam. Real Americans don't fight wars based on re-election polls.

13 posted on 05/13/2010 3:57:23 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
In all likelihood, had MacArthur had his way, we wouldn't have had a Soviet bloc Eastern Europe, Cuban Missile Crisis, Vietnam, Chinese entanglement in the US economy, and a troublesome North Korea right now.

Ah, what could have been......

14 posted on 05/13/2010 4:01:52 PM PDT by edpc (Those Lefties just ain't right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
"This story came out via a different source, sometime around 1980,"

Did that story have a ChiCom confirmation?

yitbos

15 posted on 05/13/2010 4:08:19 PM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

USSR planned nuclear attack on China in 1969 but shelved the idea because Ping Ping was still in the Moscow Zoo


16 posted on 05/13/2010 4:13:44 PM PDT by bunkerhill7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

If we could only go back and change it all...


17 posted on 05/13/2010 4:14:30 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
Only Nixon could go to China.

Vulcan philosophy.

18 posted on 05/13/2010 4:16:34 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
Actually, it was one of the newsweeklies back in the '70s. You know, back before they were all socialist mouthpieces.

/johnny

19 posted on 05/13/2010 4:19:57 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

LOL! Now we know what the screenplay writers were reading ;-)


20 posted on 05/13/2010 4:21:26 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson