Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Connecticut's wage gap: A special report (Public Sector Wage Report)
Waterbury Republican ^ | 5/9/2010 | GEORGE KRIMSKY AND PAUL HUGHES

Posted on 05/09/2010 7:11:59 AM PDT by raybbr

While Connecticut's population has been virtually stagnant for the past four decades, the cost of state government has nearly quadrupled.

The ability of taxpayers to pay for it has not.

As the gap between Connecticut's public and private sectors continues to widen, the Great Recession has brought this reality into stark relief. Even though the state faces a projected budget deficit of $3.8 billion by 2012, the state work force remains largely intact, secure and well paid, while employment and compensation in business and industry have declined precipitously.

Personnel costs basically are off limits when cutting the state budget, protected by union contracts and strong political muscle.

The state work force has dropped 4 percent since the recession took hold in late 2008, with early departures rewarded with retirement incentives. Meanwhile, the private work force has lost more than 100,000 jobs, or about 8 percent of its total, and only one in six workers received retirement benefits, according to statewide estimates.

The average annual salary of a state employee in 2009 was $65,830, 37 percent higher than the average in Connecticut's civilian sector, which the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports as $47,739.

Union leaders argue the private sector should devote its energy to achieving its own level of security and compensation, instead of trying to deprive state workers.

"Even if you laid off everyone (in state employment), it still wouldn't take care of the deficit, and you wouldn't have anyone left to serve the public," contends Eric Bailey, communication director for one of Connecticut's biggest unions, AFT, which represents nearly 20 percent of state employees.

(Excerpt) Read more at rep-am.com ...


TOPICS: Government; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS:
There are links to state employees salaries at the site - can be searched by name or division.

Eric Bailey lies of course:

Five point one seven billion dollars would cover the deficit nicely.

1 posted on 05/09/2010 7:11:59 AM PDT by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: stowaway; jjm2111; Mrs.LoneGOPinCT; underbyte; badbackman; Bigfitz; mcswan; posterkid; MAK1179; ...

How your tax dollars are spent in CT....


2 posted on 05/09/2010 7:13:15 AM PDT by raybbr (Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
"Even if you laid off everyone (in state employment), it still wouldn't take care of the deficit, and you wouldn't have anyone left to serve the public," contends Eric Bailey, communication director for one of Connecticut's biggest unions, AFT, which represents nearly 20 percent of state employees.

Sounds like Greece. The only long term solution is to default and make public sector unions illegal...

3 posted on 05/09/2010 7:15:51 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

Unfortunately, it’s here that the Republicans have joined forces with the Democrats to be the “party of government. “ Although Reagan’s decertifying the air traffic controllers was a good start, just think what could have been accomplished if he’d carried through with eliminatinfg the Dept of Education. I wonder whether Hinckley’s bullet took so much out of him that he couldn’t fight that battle.


4 posted on 05/09/2010 7:18:29 AM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

You are correct. Default is the only answer. Let’s roll.


5 posted on 05/09/2010 7:20:12 AM PDT by Sam Clements
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
On a CT-related note, from Feb....

Retirement incentives yield six-figure pensions

6 posted on 05/09/2010 7:21:16 AM PDT by mewzilla (Still voteless in NY-29.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
"Even if you laid off everyone (in state employment), it still wouldn't take care of the deficit, and you wouldn't have anyone left to serve the public," contends Eric Bailey, communication director for one of Connecticut's biggest unions, AFT, which represents nearly 20 percent of state employees.

A phony strawman. Those employees are administering state programs that could also be cut. If you cut programs, you wouldn't need as many state employees.

7 posted on 05/09/2010 7:26:27 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
"Even if you laid off everyone (in state employment), it still wouldn't take care of the deficit, and you wouldn't have anyone left to serve the public," contends Eric Bailey, communication director for one of Connecticut's biggest unions, AFT, which represents nearly 20 percent of state employees.

"....so don't lay anyone off!" contends Eric Bailey, communication director for one of Connecticut's biggest unions, AFT, which represents nearly 20 percent of state employees who think the public is there to serve them.

8 posted on 05/09/2010 7:32:09 AM PDT by Alex Murphy (Pretentiousness is so beneath me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

I wonder how many of the programs are looking out after the interests of the state workers.


9 posted on 05/09/2010 7:33:19 AM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

Classic example of how a parasitical government can kill off the host.

CT and CA will follow Greece and Spain.


10 posted on 05/09/2010 7:36:51 AM PDT by InternetTuffGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3
I wonder whether Hinckley’s bullet took so much out of him that he couldn’t fight that battle.

It was the deals with the Demonrats that allowed him to fund the military and destroy the CCCP. It came at a cost of increased social spending.

11 posted on 05/09/2010 7:53:00 AM PDT by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Would it be too simple to start with a 10% cut to everyone, and I mean everyone, who has a regular job with the government? Or even 10% of the jobs cuz then you’d only PO 10% of the government piggies instead of 100%.


12 posted on 05/09/2010 7:58:54 AM PDT by tiki (True Christians will not deliberately slander or misrepresent others or their beliefs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tiki

You need to cut programs and the jobs will follow.


13 posted on 05/09/2010 8:04:05 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

Government workers have become a bunch a of leeching parasitic bloodsuckers that will eventually destroy not only CT but the country. They are lazy overpaid and mostly useless. When it snows in DC and several hundred thousand non-essential employees stay home, why not take the opportunity to let them all say home permanently.


14 posted on 05/09/2010 8:24:15 AM PDT by appeal2 (Don't steal, the government hates competition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

It is likely true that most other states, especially liberal ones, as well as the federal government, face similar circumstances. They have huge deficits and a public work force that is overpaid and outsized relative to the private sector. A sizable percentage of the population is also dependent on government largess. The ability of the private sector to continue to fund the public sector no longer exists, the golden goose is dead. We all know these truths are undeniable.

These people will not go easily, they are on the gravy train and they know it. The politicians have no or little incentive to change, particularly at the federal level and those states with high demo concentrations like the northeast, Illinois and Cali. Welcome to Greece. As presently constituted, the system has subjected our children to debt slavery.

The real question is where does this end? Yes, financial calamity is obvious, who knows what form, does it really matter? The real question is what world do we leave to our children? Those who are owed the unpayable amounts will not be happy when they are stiffed. Those owing the unpayable amounts will not pay, they know this is not of their doing.

For this not end up in a major war and incalculable human suffering will take a miracle. It is the work of satan himself.

schu


15 posted on 05/09/2010 8:38:06 AM PDT by schu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

I live in Ct.

Hangs head in shame.


16 posted on 05/09/2010 9:24:07 AM PDT by y6162
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D Rider

Sounds like a good bet.


17 posted on 05/09/2010 1:27:17 PM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: y6162

I lived in Ct.

No longer have to hang my head in shame.


18 posted on 05/09/2010 6:13:25 PM PDT by George from New England (Escaped CT in 2006, now living north of Tampa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson