NO other Web News outlet has this YET!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: US Navy Vet
It was on CNN radio news at the bottom of the hour.........
2 posted on
04/28/2010 7:40:31 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(Education makes people easy to lead, difficult to drive; easy to govern, but impossible to enslave.)
To: US Navy Vet
Fox just reported on it this morning.
3 posted on
04/28/2010 7:40:55 AM PDT by
RC2
To: US Navy Vet
“In God We Trust’
NOT In Marx We Trust
NOT In Alinsky We Trust
NOT In Obama We Trust
4 posted on
04/28/2010 7:41:27 AM PDT by
FormerACLUmember
("Subtlety is not going to win this fight": NJ Governor Chris Christie)
To: US Navy Vet
Hooray!
Lamh Foistenach Abu! 5 posted on
04/28/2010 7:42:08 AM PDT by
ConorMacNessa
(HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines, RVN '69 - St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle!)
To: US Navy Vet
To: US Navy Vet
7 posted on
04/28/2010 7:42:37 AM PDT by
Sybeck1
(Pander to me for a change!!)
To: US Navy Vet
8 posted on
04/28/2010 7:42:43 AM PDT by
ScottinVA
(RIP to the country I love...)
To: US Navy Vet
Anybody know what the vote was?
9 posted on
04/28/2010 7:43:04 AM PDT by
Tribune7
(It is immoral to claim the tea parties to be racist)
To: US Navy Vet
a federal court went too far
Surely, they're not talking about the 9th Circus, are they?
11 posted on
04/28/2010 7:45:21 AM PDT by
SmithL
To: US Navy Vet
According to USA Today, the vote was 5-4.
12 posted on
04/28/2010 7:45:44 AM PDT by
50mm
(Sell not virtue to purchase wealth, nor Liberty to purchase power - Ben Franklin)
To: US Navy Vet
There’s our ‘bread crumb’ for the month.
13 posted on
04/28/2010 7:46:19 AM PDT by
Outlaw Woman
(Control the American people? Herding cats would be easier.)
To: US Navy Vet
15 posted on
04/28/2010 7:49:07 AM PDT by
Lorica
To: US Navy Vet
Nice! I think BO’s stunt in embarassing the Supremes early this year is going to cost him many setbacks.
Increasingly, the BO news resembles those stories “5 year old takes family car before hitting wall . . . “
16 posted on
04/28/2010 7:49:35 AM PDT by
Psalm 144
(Is it sedition to defy usurpation?)
To: US Navy Vet
Washington Post has it now on front page. Was a 5-4 decision. Opinion by Justice Kennedy. Sonia Sotomayor voted AGAINST allowing the cross to stay. Unbelievable.
17 posted on
04/28/2010 7:49:47 AM PDT by
Dems_R_Losers
(U.S. Out of My Doctor's Office!!)
To: US Navy Vet
Thank God for the supreme court to right that wrong. It is such a shame what they had done to this country. Visited that cross before and it is such a beautiful place with the cross as lighting beam for many to see while driving up.
25 posted on
04/28/2010 7:56:03 AM PDT by
Tamatoa
(Fight for our America, Fight for our Country I fought to defend!!!)
To: US Navy Vet
Does this mean this farce is finally over?
26 posted on
04/28/2010 7:57:46 AM PDT by
My hearts in London - Everett
(So the writer who breeds more words than he needs, is making a chore for the reader who reads.)
To: US Navy Vet
and it was a 5-4 ruling... why am i not surprised?
31 posted on
04/28/2010 8:01:02 AM PDT by
latina4dubya
( self-proclaimed tequila snob)
To: US Navy Vet; pissant
32 posted on
04/28/2010 8:02:43 AM PDT by
AuntB
(Illegal immigration is simply more ‘share the wealth’ socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
To: US Navy Vet
ABC radio news reporting that the USSC ruled that the cross can stay on public land.
AAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
It’s not on public land, it’s been transferred to private land.
33 posted on
04/28/2010 8:02:58 AM PDT by
Carley
(I'll keep clinging to the constitution, my guns and my religion, thank you.)
To: US Navy Vet
37 posted on
04/28/2010 8:08:57 AM PDT by
FES0844
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson