This is the problem, to many people put way too much stock in the internet musings of people who aren't trained lawyers, historians or scholars of any kind. Here's Charlton's own bio from the site you linked to...
"A natural born citizen of the USA; independent, constitutionalist, Article II Patriot, committed to defending the liberty of the American People through the use of the New Media for a Free Press"
He's not an attorney, he's not a constitutional scholar and he's not any kind of academic - he has no published authorship anywhere except in some obscure website/blog, and yet you think his opinion holds sway. Why is that?
I spent too many years in school, and too long practicing law to give even a passing thought to the rantings of an amateur, a hobbyist. I'll put it this way - you'll have more success quoting my cleaning lady.
Do you believe Obama is qualified to be President?
It’s a shame, isn’t it, when amateurs and researchers and cleaning ladies know more than pompous lawyers whose ultimate claim to credibility is that they are trained in that old habit: “when you can’t handle the message, then try to discredit the messenger.”