Replies

Free Republic
Browse · Search

News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bushpilot1

I don’t understand how vattel applies specifically to the definition of “natural born citizen”

41 posted on 04/23/2010 7:32:13 PM PDT by ckilmer (Phi)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer

The term ‘Natural Born Citizen’ was first defined in “Law of Nations”:

http://i477.photobucket.com/albums/rr131/stevesharp2918/VattelsNBC-LawofNations-citizenS.jpg

44 posted on 04/23/2010 7:43:30 PM PDT by chopperman

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer

it doesn’t. Vattel has no legal force.

The only thing that matters is what laws defined a natural born citizen in 1961.

47 posted on 04/23/2010 7:56:11 PM PDT by ChurtleDawg (voting only encourages them)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer

I don’t understand how vattel applies specifically to the definition of “natural born citizen”

|:>)

445 posted on 04/29/2010 5:56:01 AM PDT by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search

News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794