Legal immigration had never been eliminated.
Bush wanted to repeat that mistake times a factor of 50.
My original post was about terrorism, not illegal immigration.
He didn’t increase security at airports. Roughing up old ladies while ignoring the real issues doesn’t increase security.
Airport security was increased.
You keep repeating that like it excuses Bush’s support for the whole thing. Camp Bondsteel didn’t close after Clinton. US policy didn’t change after Clinton. Bush supported the same TERRORISTS that Clinton had.
Clinton's war and it was over.
You clearly think this war is only due to bin Ladin.
bin Laden and Al Qaida, Taliban, Saddam and his sons, UN oil for food, etc. A lot of things.
The Saudi government spreads jihad, provides aid and comfort to terrorists, runs freaking telethons for them, and funds mosques and madrassahs worldwide that preach the death of the infidel. There is ample evidence of all of those, but no.... you think this is just about bin Laden.
The Saudis are pro-Muslim yes...orchestrate 9-11, no. Saddam, bin Laden, and Al Qaida were the main ones that orchestrated 9-11.
Bush killed a threat to the Saudis. Bush invited more terrorists into THIS country
Oh, so you're a cut and runner. You just posted the liberal's main talking point that we can't fight terrorism because that invites more terrorism. You're a Paul nut.
“Legal immigration had never been eliminated.”
So, “legal immigration” is making US pay to bring over entire groups of people who hate us?
“My original post was about terrorism, not illegal immigration.”
The two are tightly coupled.
“Airport security was increased.”
It was not. Roughing up old ladies while continuing to ignore actual security holes is NOT increased security.
“bin Laden and Al Qaida, Taliban, Saddam and his sons, UN oil for food, etc. A lot of things. “
Including Saudi Arabia.
“The Saudis are pro-Muslim yes...orchestrate 9-11, no. Saddam, bin Laden, and Al Qaida were the main ones that orchestrated 9-11.”
9-11 was about and due to Islam. Just like every attack has been. The Saudis are pro-Jihad. We were attacked before 9-11. We have been attacked since 9-11 and I remind you, in case you have forgotten, that the majority of the hijackers were Saudis.
“Oh, so you’re a cut and runner. You just posted the liberal’s main talking point that we can’t fight terrorism because that invites more terrorism. You’re a Paul nut.”
Oh, BS. That isn’t what I said at all. You are absolutely blind to the threat and just want an excuse to attack Reagan.