Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jack Black

“What I don’t understand is your focus on ‘the national guard’. Wouldn’t the regular Army and Marine Corps be the ones to use?”

Wikipedia: The Posse Comitatus Act is a United States federal law passed on June 18, 1878, after the end of Reconstruction, with the intention of substantially limiting the powers of the federal government to use the military for law enforcement. The Act prohibits most members of the federal uniformed services (today the Army National Guard, Air Guard, and State National Guard forces when such are called into federal service) from exercising nominally state law enforcement, police, or peace officer powers that maintain “law and order” on non-federal property (states and their counties and municipal divisions) within the United States.

The statute generally prohibits federal military personnel and units of the National Guard under federal authority from acting in a law enforcement capacity within the United States, except where expressly authorized by the Constitution or Congress.

I think a rebellion, i.e., Secession, would see the Armed Forces quickly authorized by the Congress to be useable. At the present time, IMO, there would not be enough regular Army forces within U.S. borders to counter a Secession by multiple states. That could change after all the troops come home from Iraq; however, a conflict with Iran (which seems to be coming down the pike) would cause redeployment of the same forces.

To add to the problem of the U.S. military forces, the National Guard is currently highly mobilized to stations overseas, and so is also understrength as far as having to carry out operations within the U.S. boundaries.


219 posted on 03/31/2010 5:21:05 PM PDT by Nabber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies ]


To: Nabber
The biggest question is who broke away, and what hardware did they take with them. In CWI most of the military equipment in the states fell into the hands of the rebels. And it doesn't necessarily follow logical patterns. Texas while large and well financed, and with lots of potential infantry, would find its position hard to defend with no real navy, limited air power, Federal forces being brought in overland and from the Gulf, and illegals rebelling at home. Now Montana, North Dakota and Wyoming would appear to have little chance. They have small populations, a poor geographic position and lack the resources to buy help. On the other hand they have something like 400 LGM-30s scattered around their states and if even a small number fall into rebel hands nobody is going to force them back into the union.
222 posted on 03/31/2010 5:39:14 PM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson