[xzins]

I have the right to life.

That means that my access to life cannot be obstructed (or taken) by others (without due process of law.)

That does not mean that someone has to provide me with the requirements for life: food, clothing, shelter.

I have the right to health care: (see above)

That means that my access to health care cannot be obstructed by others.

That does not mean that someone has to provide me with the requirements for healthcare: money, bandages, medicines, etc.

Why does my saying you have the right to life not elicit from you the response, “Well, that means you’re saying that I have to feed you lunch at noon and dinner at six.”

[P-Marlowe]

I have the right to health care: (see above) That means that my access to health care cannot be obstructed by others.

That is a very interesting statement x. You are using language reserved by the enemy.

Can you give me an example of someone obstructing another person's right to "health care?" I mean other than the "medical procedure" to end the life of an unborn child, what other "health care" "access" has ever been obstructed in the history of this country.