Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fox News To Conduct “Extended, Exclusive” Interview With Pres. Obama
MediaITE ^ | 03/16/10 | Steve Krakauer

Posted on 03/16/2010 10:27:11 AM PDT by OldDeckHand

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 last
To: iopscusa

Agree completely with your assessment of Roger Ailes. There is no question he is a dedicated supporter of the Republican cause and one that describes himself publically as a conservative (which, no doubt, fills most of the MSM with a white rage).

It is obvious that Murdoch hired Ailes because of the latter’s professional abilities and not because of his political views. My concern, however, is based on recent evidence the corporate atmosphere could be changing.

Here is a 2009/2010 (?) statement by a member of the Murdoch family:
“I am by no means alone within the family or the company in being ashamed and sickened by Roger Ailes’s horrendous and sustained disregard of the journalistic standards that News Corporation…(and) its founder (Murdoch) aspires to,” said Matthew Freud, who is married to [Rupert Murdoch’s daughter Elizabeth]”

Does anyone believe that was a knee-jerk, “unauthorized” public statement?

Even apart from this, Ailes’ position within the Murdoch empire remains as fragile as any employee; as pointed out in #52 above he has two choices if a determined Murdoch leans on him.

Is Ailes waivering on his policies?
I missed Ailes’ purported televised statement (Jan 2010?) that “Fox is no longer at war with Obama” but, if true, can only imagine what would have prompted him to make such a statement.
Nor can I quickly find credible evidence that Ailes confronted Murdoch over the latter’s prospective endorsement of Obama, but wonder if anyone would think that Ailes would not step forward on such a matter. In any event, the matter may have been resolved by the increased contract Ailes received and the fact Murdoch made no such endorsement.

There could be intense pressure on Ailes if the second largest holder of voting stock actually recently said and believes that he can control the FOX news content.
As an aside, those of us who have spent any time in a ME Muslim nation are not impressed by the fact that the richest guy in SA, a member of the royal family, is an astute businessman.

So, we may see an interview unedited by O and his handlers that exposes O and is somehow published over O’s objections (Good Hunting, Bret!)
Or we may see a telecast that gives full respect to the Office of the President.
As pointed out above, FReepers soon will be able to judge for themselves whether O is playing FOX.


81 posted on 03/17/2010 10:26:52 AM PDT by frog in a pot (Wake up America! There is presently a war at home against you and your Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: frog in a pot

Good response frog, thx.


82 posted on 03/17/2010 10:31:30 AM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

O IS SUBMITTING HIMSELF BEFORE FOXNEWS, HA!


83 posted on 03/17/2010 11:06:32 AM PDT by TheDailyChange (Politics,Conservatism,Liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson