Don't mess with Texas washington bureaucrats
1 posted on
03/15/2010 8:49:59 AM PDT by
kwill4u
To: steelyourfaith
2 posted on
03/15/2010 8:50:48 AM PDT by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: ForGod'sSake
3 posted on
03/15/2010 8:51:04 AM PDT by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: kwill4u
Good. Keep doing that.
Demand scientific backing and/or credible studies for all new and old inane regulations.
4 posted on
03/15/2010 8:56:24 AM PDT by
BitWielder1
(Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
To: kwill4u
5 posted on
03/15/2010 9:48:35 AM PDT by
backwoods-engineer
("It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself." --Jefferson)
To: kwill4u
Curious, how many other molecules are classified “pollutants” and are also necessary compounds that without, all plant life on the earth ceases to exist?
8 posted on
03/15/2010 12:19:56 PM PDT by
central_va
( http://www.15thvirginia.org)
To: kwill4u
In the words of Lord Monckton:
“JAIL THE LOT”
9 posted on
03/15/2010 12:22:45 PM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
To: kwill4u
10 posted on
03/15/2010 12:39:50 PM PDT by
AngryJawa
(Obama's Success is America's Failure)
To: kwill4u
11 posted on
03/15/2010 1:58:16 PM PDT by
neverdem
(Xin loi minh oi)
To: kwill4u
The only problem with 'suing the EPA' is ..... you can't.
In order for a person to file a lawsuit against an agency of the 'Feral Goobermint'(sic), you must first have the agency's permission to sue them. I'm series. I read this on a Law Library website and here on FR a couple weeks ago.
This is different than suing the 'Feral Goobermint'(sic) as a whole for violating your rights. Or like that mope in CA who finally lost is his 'God' lawsuit last week when the 9th Circus told him to go pound sand.
So unless the EPA says, okay sure, you can sue us. You're s.o.l. and can't sue them.
12 posted on
03/15/2010 2:11:00 PM PDT by
Condor51
(A person who never made a mistake never tried anything new. [A. Einstein])
To: kwill4u
EPA has a small problem. No money to commit to the study. Adoption of the IPCC study was free and quick.
Writing a proposal for a contract and taking bids takes a long time. (The EPA relies on contractors for getting real work done)
15 posted on
03/16/2010 4:37:41 AM PDT by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . Tax the poor. Taxes will give them a stake in society)
To: kwill4u
If co2 is so damn dangerous, why is the FDA allowing it to carbonate our dodas? Not that I drink that much....but...if its now a poison....Im just sayin....
16 posted on
03/16/2010 4:45:48 AM PDT by
bike800
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson