[WL-law]

Why is this a post on FR? It’s incoherent. Why is your blog not sufficient for this?

[butterdezillion]

Miss Tickly e-mailed Joesting in direct response to a challenge by Ender Wiggins, here on FR. Other posters here have ridiculed MT for “jumping to unwarranted conclusions” so she put everything on the line to ask Joesting directly - an act of courage not shown by those who have ridiculed her.

The response strongly suggests that MT was correct: when the DOH denied her access to the records for Obama’s amendment to his BC, it confirmed that those documents exist and Obama’s BC is amended.

Does that make things a little more coherent? I think there may be people here who are interested to see this.

[Tex-Con-Man]

Why is this a post on FR? It’s incoherent

Ssshhhh...irther-bay ead-thray.

[Brown Deer]

Why is this a post on FR?

Because it is informative.

It’s incoherent.

Not really.

Why is your blog not sufficient for this?

Why did you bother coming to this thread, since it very clearly said, "Blog Update" in the title?

Interesting, that this was only your 2d post in almost 3 weeks! ;-)

[verity]

Miss Tickly's...

Was that Eric Massa's code name? ;-)

[LucyT]

The 150 people whom I pinged understand the Post/article perfectly well; you just haven’t been keeping up.

[danamco]

Are you for free speech or not???