Update.
Posted on 03/11/2010 10:21:48 AM PST by butterdezillion
I've added to my blog a post showing that OIP Attorney Linden Joesting, when asked point-blank on Feb 22nd whether Miss Tickly's understanding that Obama's BC was amended is correct, refused to correct MT's understanding. After 2 days of asking for clarification on the question, she responded 3 days later by saying she didn't have time to answer the question.
The legal meaning of the denial of access, which has been documented through multiple consistent sources, stands. It would have taken no more time for Joesting to say that MT misunderstood than to say she ddn't have time to answer the question. The OIP wants to ignore the question because the answer would confirm the fact of Obama's amended BC.
The link to the article will be in the 1st reply to the initial post.
Here’s the link to the post:
http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/03/11/joesting-wont-correct-terri-k/
Ping.
Thanks for your work on this. I will always say you are an amazing person.
~~PING!
Why is this a post on FR? It’s incoherent. Why is your blog not sufficient for this?
Is Miss Tickly back? She and Leo had Hawaii busted and the slimy state keeps convering up for you know who.
Miss Tickly e-mailed Joesting in direct response to a challenge by Ender Wiggins, here on FR. Other posters here have ridiculed MT for “jumping to unwarranted conclusions” so she put everything on the line to ask Joesting directly - an act of courage not shown by those who have ridiculed her.
The response strongly suggests that MT was correct: when the DOH denied her access to the records for Obama’s amendment to his BC, it confirmed that those documents exist and Obama’s BC is amended.
Does that make things a little more coherent? I think there may be people here who are interested to see this.
Update.
Ssshhhh...irther-bay ead-thray.
There are. Thanks for posting this. And kudos to Mrs Tickley!
Cuz Bill Gates is part of the BC conspiracy.
Thanks for posting this. Interesting indeed!
Hard to tell if you’re being facetious or not. I know it sounds crazy to people who haven’t experienced it first-hand, but I’ve seen both McAfee and Google involved in crap with this subject. I didn’t think there was the ability to mess with Word, but then I’m a computer moron so that’s why I ask smarter people for input. lol.
Microsoft has the IP address of everyone who has ever posted a “where’s the birth certificate” comment on a computer BBS.
I know that you think that’s funny but there are people who have had their firewalls breached and their computers messed with. It isn’t a joke.
Microsoft has the IP address of everyone who has ever posted a “where’s the birth certificate” comment on a computer BBS.
Yeah and Google has records of every search by Hawaii DOH officials on Information Requestors.....
Bump for MT!
Thanks for the update. This doesn’t surprise me, but it’s good to know.
What the trolls on these threads don’t seem to understand is that they only add to the perception that Obama has something to cover up, and that he finds the whole business threatening to his power grab.
Hmmmm...wouldn’t an attorney be anxious to set the recoed straight by answering the question?
What a cop-out to say *I don’t have the time to answer.*
Oops...recoed = record.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.