...I think he ran as a pro-choice Republican when he ran for the Senate and when he ran for governor. I think he's been clear that he's changed his position. I heard him say so on an interview with Chris Wallace this week. What I am trying to determine is why that's apparently a bad thing for so many here, shouldn't his change be regarded as progress?
Is the concern that he is secretly pro-choice? That he would not appoint a pro-life justice were he to become president? Or that he wouldn't oppose federal funding for abortions were he to become president?
You are calling the man a liar yourself about something so simple as to whether he was pro abortion all of his life until the start of preparation for the 2008 primary. You are studiously avoiding the truth of him being a compulsive liar and the biggest sleaze in Republican politics as mentioned in posts 49, 80, and 82, conservatives do not believe his massive series of instant conversions.
People do not believe Mitt Romney is truthful about anything, but more and more are starting to think that they can believe his past life before he started running for the 2008 primary.